[PLEASE HELP] who is the more natural finisher Theo or Babel

[Dynamite Kid]

who is the more natural finisher Theo or Babel ?

Babel has the edge on goal tally allthough i think that is misleading as Walcott has been having a confidence crisis for the last 12 months and has lots of preasure heaped on his shoulders after his world cup inclusion

im not overreacting to Theo's hatrick its just ive always maintained that Theo is a natural goal scorer and a few months ago i commented on a vid on youtube and i was having an argument with a Liverpool fan cause i thought Walcott was a better finisher and he thought Babel was the better Finisher

who do you think is the more natural finisher ,better finisher

BTW the biased Pool fan has no need to comment we know he picks Babel by default because he is soo biased

watch the composure he never lashes at the ball placement


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AALrpPtO9Ug

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=asCfd5SB1Pg

[Addition]

Theo. He can finish.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AALrpPtO9Ug

Both these goals show his finishing ability.

[Nicky_Hatton]

Babel is ****.

I don't believe anyone liverpool buys is good apart from Torress.

I have to respect Wengers judgement far more than Benitez.

[Dynamite Kid]

here is another anyone who thinks Babel is a more natural finisher is either biased or just aint got a clue what their watching

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udvNzrjGZvo

a few more

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHkEKAiphBA

[Mozza]

Babel is actually much better through the middle than he is on the wing. Whether either of them can be described as a natural finisher is debatable.

[Dynamite Kid]

Babel is actually much better through the middle than he is on the wing. Whether either of them can be described as a natural finisher is debatable.

Walcott does not get his chance down the middle though he is a striker not a winger

[Chrismart]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kL218iv6qC4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Izhxw...eature=related

Babel has been pretty composed with the majority of chances which have came his way since he's been at Liverpool. Id like to see him used as a striker though so more chances would come is way.

Cant really say to much abut Walcott as i havent really seen enough of him. He was impressive the other night though and seems to be quickly maturing into a very good player.

[Dynamite Kid]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kL218iv6qC4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Izhxw...eature=related

Babel has been pretty composed with the majority of chances which have came his way since he's been at Liverpool. Id like to see him used as a striker though so more chances would come is way.

Cant really say to much abut Walcott as i havent really seen enough of him. He was impressive the other night though and seems to be quickly maturing into a very good player.

i think Babel is a good player and he probably has the edge over Walcott when the ball is at his feet he has better control with the ball at pace etc but Walcott for me is the real finisher of the two

its like i dont think Michael Owen is a great finisher but he has great positioning and most of time his chances come when he is 5 ,10 yards out because of that great positioning and that IMO is why he has scored so many goals i dont think he is a clinical finisher by any stretch though

remember RVN before he left Man Utd he had not scored a goal from outside the box untill just before he left United you dont have to be a great finisher to be a great goal scorer IMO

Robbie Fowler was far more clincal than Owen IMO

[Barndog]

As soon as Theo was one on one with the keeper, it was no doubt. He's got skills.. i never rated him that incredibly, until last night.

[Mozza]

Walcott does not get his chance down the middle though he is a striker not a winger

Neither has Babel really, not at Liverpool anyway. My inclination is that Walcott is too small to play through the middle, much will depend on how he develops in the next few years, he still has plenty of time ahead of him.