So the only (somewhat) valid argument I've seen for CEOs making millions per year is that leading a company is difficult and not many people can do it.
So if a CEO successfully leads a company, maybe they deserve huge compensation for it.
But if a CEO makes $10 million in a year where he makes a couple of bad decisions and 1,000 people get laid off, shouldn't he NOT deserve $10 million?
So if a CEO successfully leads a company, maybe they deserve huge compensation for it.
But if a CEO makes $10 million in a year where he makes a couple of bad decisions and 1,000 people get laid off, shouldn't he NOT deserve $10 million?
Comment