Mathis only lost to the top fighters of his day, who in my opinion were head and shoulders above today's sorry crop of heavyweights. With his speed and size how do you think he would fare today?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Buster Mathis
Collapse
-
he was a solid contender but i cant by any strecth see him being more than a solid contender in any era he fights in.i dont think he would stand a chance with either klit,or even a lesser tier like eddie chambers.like chris arreola he seems to have no discipline outside the ring.he was very skilled for a fatback though
-
-
Originally posted by r.burgundy View Posthe was a solid contender but i cant by any strecth see him being more than a solid contender in any era he fights in.i dont think he would stand a chance with either klit,or even a lesser tier like eddie chambers.like chris arreola he seems to have no discipline outside the ring.he was very skilled for a fatback though
His beating of Chuvalo is more impressive than anything Chambers accomplished thus far and he has a much better work rate than todays fighters.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by r.burgundy View Posthe was a solid contender but i cant by any strecth see him being more than a solid contender in any era he fights in.i dont think he would stand a chance with either klit,or even a lesser tier like eddie chambers.like chris arreola he seems to have no discipline outside the ring.he was very skilled for a fatback though
Comment
-
Originally posted by sonnyboyx2 View Posti disagree... Buster Mathis was a huge guy and very skilled boxer as well as having exceptional footwork for a man his size unlike the Klitschko brothers who are both `Robotic`with feet that are nailed to the canvas, i would give Mathis a great shout of beating both brothers especially Vitali.. i see Mathis having the movement and skills to win a wide decision over Vitali who i feel would look amateurish against a guy like Mathis
Comment
Comment