Former tennis champ Margaret Court claims LGBTQ teaching in schools is due to devil

[HitmanTommy]

Former tennis champion Margaret Court has reiterated her controversial opinions on the LGBTQ community and transgender athletes, claiming LGBTQ teaching in schools is controlled by "the devil

You know, even that LGBT in the schools, it's the devil, it's not of God," the 77-year-old said.

"Children are making the decision at seven or eight years of age to change their sex, no, just read the first two chapters of Genesis, that's all I say. Male and female," Court said.
"It's so wrong at that age because a lot of things are planted in this thought realm at that age, and they start to question 'what am I'.

"And you know with that LGBT, they'll wish they never put the T on the end of it because, particularly in women's sports, they're going to have so many problems.

"You have got young people taking hormones and having changes, by the time they are 17 they are thinking, 'Now I'm a boy and really I was a girl.'"

Court won all four majors in 1970 during an illustrious career that yielded a record 24 grand slam singles victories.

"The devil gets in and the media and the political, the education, TV -- he wants to control a nation so he can affect people's minds and mouths," Court said


Court is still the most decorated tennis player of all time with a record of 24 grand slam singles which today remains unmatched in both the men's and the women's game. Serena Williams is second on the all-time list with 23, ahead of Steffi Graf's 22

[Lomasexual]

She's an awful person, and most of us Australians hate her guts.

[Tomjas]

She's an awful person, and most of us Australians hate her guts.

Dude please

She’s 77 and very conservative

I seriously doubt that she hates gays, bis or trannies

We’re simply living in an era where anyone who puts forward a contrary view is vilified

And btw, I don’t agree with most things that she says

[Lomasexual]

We’re simply living in an era where anyone who puts forward a contrary view is vilified

It is disingenuous to imply that is what is happening here.

She is villified because she is a raging bigot - not because she has 'a contrary view'. She deserves all of the crap she gets - and more.

Being old is not an excuse for being an awful person. Being conservative in not an excuse for being an awful person. 'Not hating' the people you are bigoted against does not excuse bigotry.

What is your skin in this game, that you are so keen to put forward bullshit to defend this person? I've seen you post rationally before - why has this topic caused you to post nonsense?

[Tomjas]

It is disingenuous to imply that is what is happening here.

She is villified because she is a raging bigot - not because she has 'a contrary view'. She deserves all of the crap she gets - and more.

Being old is not an excuse for being an awful person. Being conservative in not an excuse for being an awful person. 'Not hating' the people you are bigoted against does not excuse bigotry.

What is your skin in this game, that you are so keen to put forward bullshit to defend this person? I've seen you post rationally before - why has this topic caused you to post nonsense?

Nothing mate

She’s a religious nut

I simply choose not to listen to her

Doesn’t change the fact that she was a great tennis player

[////]

It is disingenuous to imply that is what is happening here.

She is villified because she is a raging bigot - not because she has 'a contrary view'. She deserves all of the crap she gets - and more.

Being old is not an excuse for being an awful person. Being conservative in not an excuse for being an awful person. 'Not hating' the people you are bigoted against does not excuse bigotry.

What is your skin in this game, that you are so keen to put forward bullshit to defend this person? I've seen you post rationally before - why has this topic caused you to post nonsense?

I feel like you're trying really hard to be fashionable here & don't actually feel any of what you're saying.

There's just no way you'd freak out this much on your own about an elderly religious woman thinking it's evil to teach gay stuff in schools.

At most the "real you" would shrug to one side of the fence or the other. It's not that big of a deal.

Dramatically proclaiming her an awful person over and over and speaking on behalf of "We Australians" seems like a fictional persona worked up specifically for social media.

The same fashionistas who feign "outrage" over a granny's dry criticism of the gay movement will shrug with indifference towards the imminent death of their own nationalities, modern mass slave trades, etc.

They wait for something to be deemed fashionable in the media before pretending to care about it. Purely for the sake of fashion. They seek out the trivial.

The concern is fake & you likely view yourselves as awful people, but can't break the habit.

[Beercules]

No problem with gay people but trans, that's mental illness.

[Lomasexual]

I feel like you're trying really hard to be fashionable here & don't actually feel any of what you're saying.

There's just no way you'd freak out this much on your own about an elderly religious woman thinking it's evil to teach gay stuff in schools.

At most the "real you" would shrug to one side of the fence or the other. It's not that big of a deal.

Dramatically proclaiming her an awful person over and over and speaking on behalf of "We Australians" seems like a fictional persona worked up specifically for social media.

The same fashionistas who feign "outrage" over a granny's dry criticism of the gay movement will shrug with indifference towards the imminent death of their own nationalities, modern mass slave trades, etc.

They wait for something to be deemed fashionable in the media before pretending to care about it. Purely for the sake of fashion. They seek out the trivial.

The concern is fake & you likely view yourselves as awful people, but can't break the habit.

You need therapy.

I'm vocal on this very forum against SJW idiocy.

But you create these crazy little stories in your head and convince yourself they are profound truths.

Seriously, you are defective, divorced from reality, and need help.

[////]

You need therapy.

I'm vocal on this very forum against SJW idiocy.

But you create these crazy little stories in your head and convince yourself they are profound truths.

Seriously, you are defective, divorced from reality, and need help.

Extremely upset non-response would suggest I hit the nail on the head.

[Lomasexual]

Extremely upset non-response would suggest I hit the nail on the head.

Extremely upset? Do you even listen to yourself?

I'm saying you are a lunatic. That isn't someone being upset, it is someone calling you a lunatic.

The fact you get the two confused is just evidence that you are a lunatic.