If Their Were To Be Factual Criteria For Winning Fighter of the Year What Would it Be

[TheManniePhresh]

I would factor in activity, wins vs losses, punch accuracy, ko ratio, championships gained, championship defences, gaining and holding lineal titles, but numbers you know some cold hard facts to back your claim. what would you gus add?

[qwerty07]

But how would you calculate these numbers and titles to figure out who's better? You can't.
Boxing, more than any other sport, is a sport of opinions. There is no way you can prove that, for example, accuracy is more important than workrate, that all wins is more important that quality/championship wins and a loss or 2.

[TheManniePhresh]

But how would you calculate these numbers and titles to figure out who's better? You can't.
Boxing, more than any other sport, is a sport of opinions. There is no way you can prove that, for example, accuracy is more important than workrate, that all wins is more important that quality/championship wins and a loss or 2.

why cant you incorporate numbers into the equation? of coarse every the popular fighters will be in the drawing but so should fighters like edwin valero. you put all the fighters in then do the math. and your right on the quality of opponents being factored in to. i didnt think about that one.