Is there a legitimate notion in the GGG that he can't win on decision?

[Little Mac 91]

*In the GGG team as a whole was what the title was meant to say, and Sanchez in particular.

Or is it just Abel talking for the sake of stirring up articles? Because if he or GGG really believe then it should not be taken casually and with a sense of defeatism but the case should be voiced over and over beforehand so as to give it attention and create an atmosphere where it becomes a serious argument that needs to be faced and refuted. Even if they can't unseat any judge or change anything atleast those allegations puts them on the defense, highligting the bias that may come.

...Or maybe the argument is leaning more on the side of a conspiracy thory after all and even if there is some suspicion they ultimately accept that the judging is most likely fair.

But it would be incredibly stupid from Abel to just shrug it off and think "oh that's just the way it is", resolving his team to their fate and that there must be a stoppage/KO. Even if that outcome has always been the strength of GGG you don't do **** like that conceding advantages.

And if Abel actually thinks this is a worthwile tradeoff in exchange for some kind of mindgame points where he gets to advocate GGG's knockout power and aggressivness he's clearly way lost crippling his fighter instead of defending him.

[whoelsebutjames]

*In the GGG team as a whole was what the title was meant to say, and Sanchez in particular.

Or is it just Abel talking for the sake of stirring up articles? Because if he or GGG really believe then it should not be taken casually and with a sense of defeatism but the case should be voiced over and over beforehand so as to give it attention and create an atmosphere where it becomes a serious argument that needs to be faced and refuted. Even if they can't unseat any judge or change anything atleast those allegations puts them on the defense, highligting the bias that may come.

...Or maybe the argument is leaning more on the side of a conspiracy thory after all and even if there is some suspicion they ultimately accept that the judging is most likely fair.

But it would be incredibly stupid from Abel to just shrug it off and think "oh that's just the way it is", resolving his team to their fate and that there must be a stoppage/KO. Even if that outcome has always been the strength of GGG you don't do **** like that conceding advantages.

And if Abel actually thinks this is a worthwile tradeoff in exchange for some kind of mindgame points where he gets to advocate GGG's knockout power and aggressivness he's clearly way lost crippling his fighter instead of defending him.

It's propoganda. Of course he can win a decision- all he has to do is outbox him.

[whoelsebutjames]

Abel an co are hedging their bets in case Canelo doesn't roll over and lay down at the first sign of adversity. And if the fight is tooth and nail close than he deserves to loose. Let's not forget he cherry picked this fight.

[Ray*]

I think he can but it is difficult to see him boxing to a UD win. No offence to Canelo but a judge score his fight with Mayweather a draw!!! In a fight where Canelo was heard saying under his breath "That isn't close" when that scorecard came in. So whilst i could see GGG winning a decision, getting that decision is another thing.

[The tucker]

If golden boy can Put a gun to TBE and Try to rob him I'm pretty sure they will shoot ggg in broad daylight in front of everyone with 0 cares in the world and run off with his belts lol.

But I still think canelo legitimately beats him.

[Lester Tutor]

It is stupid to believe that after CJ Ross... GBP mgmt wouldn't be concerned about press and heat, or rather the "judges" for bouts like Ndam vs Murata or NC's being stamped.

Such theories need to be evaluated after the judges are known as their title Bout backgrounds are easy to see. Not all judges score the same nor consistently.

These are just stupid excuses about judges. If anything, Nelo was less liked by judges compared to how Lara boxed Williams...

If a judge gave it to Jacobs it's simply "he was bought". With a black screen for the broadcast where we the fans have no say nor know what happened

[PK3434]

He can win a decision.

But there has been so much weird scoring for Canelo in the past where it seems like more than just incompetence. Then there are other influences that can possibly but not likely come into play (Cartel bribes, etc). The bottom line is that these judges don't get paid much and are only human and are susceptible to outside influences.

But I think Golovkin is a big enough star that judges won't be too worried about pleasing Golden Boy to get approved for future dates. I think that helps things for GGG a little.

[The Big Dunn]

GGG, his team and his fans please just stop. If you go out and whip Canelo like Raheem did morales you will get a UD win. If you fight like Manny did against Floyd you will lose by lopsided UD.

Yes it will be tough to get a decision in a close fight so handle your business.

[dan_cov]

You's was saying before he knocks everybody out all the way upto light heavyweight. Now all of a sudden you're worried about a guy whose never fought at the weight?

[j.razor]

It's propoganda. Of course he can win a decision- all he has to do is outbox him.

That's the whole point, he can't box! Lol....the boy has pop & that's where it stops. He got outboxed by Jacobs, he was also getting outboxed by a welterweight till he busted his eye socket. He has to KO Nelo to win.