I noticed a lot of posters will often nit pick a lot of weaker/out of shape Heavys from the current era and say 'see HW Boxing has not evolved.' Why not use the true standards of the word modern? Why not use the 90's fighters and throw in K2 as the model of boxing evolution:
Think about this: Do you guys honestly think that Jack Johnson, Rocky Marciano, Jack Dempsey, Joe Frazier, Jerry Quarry, Cleveland Williams and a bunch of light heavyweights can beat the likes of
Lennox Lewis, Riddick Bowe, Wladimir and Vitali Klitschko, Mike Tyson, Evander Holyfield, Ray Mercer, David Tua, Ike Ibuebechi,.... etc.. It's absurd.
David Tua would have torn the 20's apart... as would Ike. With the exception of Ali and Foreman.. everyone else from the top 30 would have been massive under dogs against the top 30 of the 90's/current era.
Let's stop using examples like Chris Arreloa and say 'see Heavyweights did not evolve'.. Let's start pointing out the 230+ Pound skilled modernized Heavys of the 90's era.. and see what the gap really is.
Think about this: Do you guys honestly think that Jack Johnson, Rocky Marciano, Jack Dempsey, Joe Frazier, Jerry Quarry, Cleveland Williams and a bunch of light heavyweights can beat the likes of
Lennox Lewis, Riddick Bowe, Wladimir and Vitali Klitschko, Mike Tyson, Evander Holyfield, Ray Mercer, David Tua, Ike Ibuebechi,.... etc.. It's absurd.
David Tua would have torn the 20's apart... as would Ike. With the exception of Ali and Foreman.. everyone else from the top 30 would have been massive under dogs against the top 30 of the 90's/current era.
Let's stop using examples like Chris Arreloa and say 'see Heavyweights did not evolve'.. Let's start pointing out the 230+ Pound skilled modernized Heavys of the 90's era.. and see what the gap really is.
Comment