Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Hey, Mayweather, why not Paul Williams?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Hey, Mayweather, why not Paul Williams?

    Hey, Mayweather, why not Paul Williams?
    January 13, 2010 | 11:51 am
    Let's be honest. If Manny Pacquiao and Floyd Mayweather Jr. stick to their guns and keep their next bouts both scheduled for March 13 after blowing the opportunity to make a mega-fight together that night, Pacquiao vs. Joshua Clottey is more appealing than a one-sided Mayweather showcase against either Paulie Malignaggi or Nate Campbell.

    So, here's an unasked-for suggestion to Mayweather: Why not continue the game of one-upmanship with Pacquiao and make a more competitive fight than his by selecting Paul Williams as your next opponent?

    "If we were asked, I'd go pick Paul up, and we'd be there as fast we could get there to sign the contract," Williams' promoter Dan Goossen told The Times.

    The ever-punching Williams (38-1, 27 KOs) against the defensive wizard Mayweather would be a classic match-up. Williams, who last year posted middleweight victories over Winky Wright and Sergio Martinez, has fought as low as 147 pounds as recently as June 2008 and is an HBO fighter like "Money" so it would appear easy to facilitate.

    Is Mayweather interested in Williams? His promoter, Richard Schaefer, was not immediately available for comment today, and neither was his advisor, Leonard Ellerbe.

    Mayweather routinely questions the name recognition of opponents he doesn't want to fight, but how could he do that with Williams and then select either a Malignaggi or Campbell?

    Mayweather-Williams makes sense, but, of course, as we've seen with the crumbled Mayweather-Pacquiao negotiations, that doesn't mean the fight gets made.

    -- Lance Pugmire

  • #2
    Originally posted by *AKO PA HA! View Post
    Hey, Mayweather, why not Paul Williams?
    January 13, 2010 | 11:51 am
    Let's be honest. If Manny Pacquiao and Floyd Mayweather Jr. stick to their guns and keep their next bouts both scheduled for March 13 after blowing the opportunity to make a mega-fight together that night, Pacquiao vs. Joshua Clottey is more appealing than a one-sided Mayweather showcase against either Paulie Malignaggi or Nate Campbell.

    So, here's an unasked-for suggestion to Mayweather: Why not continue the game of one-upmanship with Pacquiao and make a more competitive fight than his by selecting Paul Williams as your next opponent?

    "If we were asked, I'd go pick Paul up, and we'd be there as fast we could get there to sign the contract," Williams' promoter Dan Goossen told The Times.

    The ever-punching Williams (38-1, 27 KOs) against the defensive wizard Mayweather would be a classic match-up. Williams, who last year posted middleweight victories over Winky Wright and Sergio Martinez, has fought as low as 147 pounds as recently as June 2008 and is an HBO fighter like "Money" so it would appear easy to facilitate.

    Is Mayweather interested in Williams? His promoter, Richard Schaefer, was not immediately available for comment today, and neither was his advisor, Leonard Ellerbe.

    Mayweather routinely questions the name recognition of opponents he doesn't want to fight, but how could he do that with Williams and then select either a Malignaggi or Campbell?

    Mayweather-Williams makes sense, but, of course, as we've seen with the crumbled Mayweather-Pacquiao negotiations, that doesn't mean the fight gets made.

    -- Lance Pugmire
    Hey Pac why not Foreman? Oh wait....

    Comment


    • #3
      can u link that please? nice find!! green k

      Comment


      • #4
        Because it's a stupid ass fight. I always said, Paul Williams and Antonio Margarito were the WORST possible match ups for Floyd.

        I also said, I don't blame Floyd for avoiding those two fighters because I would too.

        Fighting a guy 6'+, has the reach of Ali, the workrate of a Flyweight, a granite chin, plateau of power, and can fight inside and outside. Is a guaranteed loss for Floyd.

        I'm a Floyd fan and I am probably the only one that will admitt that Floyd would lose to PWill.

        Comment


        • #5
          Paul Williams has losses.

          Paul Williams isn't that big of a draw.

          Paul Williams is a bum with no defense.

          Paul and Floyd played basketball together.

          Comment


          • #6
            i like that fight alot and that is who i hope he fights next,fuk cambell,paulie and hatton

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by ThePunchingBag View Post
              Paul Williams has losses.

              Paul Williams isn't that big of a draw.

              Paul Williams is a bum with no defense.

              Paul and Floyd played basketball together.

              Seriously? A BUM?

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by grgsbrwr View Post
                can u link that please? nice find!! green k
                http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/spor...-williams.html

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by F l i c k e r View Post
                  Because it's a stupid ass fight. I always said, Paul Williams and Antonio Margarito were the WORST possible match ups for Floyd.

                  I also said, I don't blame Floyd for avoiding those two fighters because I would too.

                  Fighting a guy 6'+, has the reach of Ali, the workrate of a Flyweight, a granite chin, plateau of power, and can fight inside and outside. Is a guaranteed loss for Floyd.

                  I'm a Floyd fan and I am probably the only one that will admitt that Floyd would lose to PWill.
                  if it ever happens,pbf schools him,hes to easy to hit and pbf would punish him,imo

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    PAUL WILLIAMS by KO.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP