Tweet
1) Floyd Mayweather claims that he moved up from 106 the same as Pacquaio, and knocked out Ricky Hatton the same as Pacquaio. But now he believes there is something fishy about a guy who moves up from 106 and knocks out elite fighters. Hmmm? I suggest you check the mirror Floyd.
2) Floyd Mayweather claimed that Pacquaio didn't want to fight him because he told the media that his promoter dealt with his fight schedule and wouldn't comment on speculation. When Mayweather was asked whether or not he would be fighting Pacquaio, he responded "talk to my promoter". Talk **** much Floyd?
3) The Mayweathers claim that Pacquaio's amazing performances over De La Hoya, Hatton, and Cotto are down to using illegal substances. Mayweather only just beat De La Hoya in laborious fashion, but had a dominating win over Marquez two and a half years later. Does this mean that Mayweather should come under the same scrutiny as Pacquaio is experiencing? I mean, how does a fighter go from an average to dominating performance when he is two more years past his prime and rusty? Most people would look at the detail, but the Mayweather only see things in black and white. The Mayweathers and the rest.
Most people are viewing the Mayweather - Pacquaio situation, as a tale of an innocent sportsman and a guilty drug user. This is without no evidence or proof whatsoever. Minds have already been made. My point is, if Pacquaio's career and achievements are coming into question because of glittering performances in higher weight classes. Then surely Mayweather should be painted with the same brush. After all in Mayweather's eyes, Pacquaio's never done anything he has never done.
There is nothing worse than a contradictory hypocrite.
2) Floyd Mayweather claimed that Pacquaio didn't want to fight him because he told the media that his promoter dealt with his fight schedule and wouldn't comment on speculation. When Mayweather was asked whether or not he would be fighting Pacquaio, he responded "talk to my promoter". Talk **** much Floyd?
3) The Mayweathers claim that Pacquaio's amazing performances over De La Hoya, Hatton, and Cotto are down to using illegal substances. Mayweather only just beat De La Hoya in laborious fashion, but had a dominating win over Marquez two and a half years later. Does this mean that Mayweather should come under the same scrutiny as Pacquaio is experiencing? I mean, how does a fighter go from an average to dominating performance when he is two more years past his prime and rusty? Most people would look at the detail, but the Mayweather only see things in black and white. The Mayweathers and the rest.
Most people are viewing the Mayweather - Pacquaio situation, as a tale of an innocent sportsman and a guilty drug user. This is without no evidence or proof whatsoever. Minds have already been made. My point is, if Pacquaio's career and achievements are coming into question because of glittering performances in higher weight classes. Then surely Mayweather should be painted with the same brush. After all in Mayweather's eyes, Pacquaio's never done anything he has never done.
There is nothing worse than a contradictory hypocrite.
these pac fanboys are something else .
Comment