Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

for boxing would you rather be..

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Ok, gotcha.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by Southpaw16 View Post
      haha, this discussion is pointless, because every short and stocky person is going to come on and say "short and stocky" and every tall and thin person is gonna say the opposite, it is impossible to get unbiased opinions about this. By the way... I say tall and thin.
      well i'm tall and built but i think if i had to pick out of those two options i would go for short and stocky

      Comment


      • #13
        well, i'm short and stocky but i've fought tall thin guys, both can be big punchers..

        Comment


        • #14
          In between like Foreman...

          He wasn't stocky but he wasnt lanky either

          Comment


          • #15
            Imagine if you could squeeze a 6'2 frame into welter? Id rather be taller and leaner. I mean names like corralles, de la hoya, hearns, saddler come into mind. They all had great success.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by boxingguy1226 View Post
              Imagine if you could squeeze a 6'2 frame into welter? Id rather be taller and leaner. I mean names like corralles, de la hoya, hearns, saddler come into mind. They all had great success.
              there was a 6'2" welter about 15 years ago, he was black, i wish i could remember his name. he was very succesful, i think he may have even won a belt

              Comment

              Working...
              X
              TOP