Hell no. How do you come to that conclusion? There have been so many guys better then Oscar since Duran. How does beating Tito prove anything when he has been killed in 2 of his recent fights and is clearly starting to get washed up? Its a good win for Oscar but there's nothing historical about it.
Then if he beats Floyd, its a good win but it wouldnt be a huge shock. He is much bigger then him. Duran was way better then Oscar and there have been so many guys since, better then Oscar.
Thats not to take anything away from him because he's been a very good fighter but he's not the super elite. You could easily argue that he got stopped by Hopkins, lost twice to Shane, lost to Sturm, lost to Tito, lost to Sweet Pea, lost to Ike, and I think there's another one Im missing. Now you could definatly go alot of different ways in those fights but there are alot of people who think that he lost all of them and he's never ever had that dominant performance in a big fight like all the greats have. You could argue that he had it against Vargas but he was halfway shot by then.
Then if he beats Floyd, its a good win but it wouldnt be a huge shock. He is much bigger then him. Duran was way better then Oscar and there have been so many guys since, better then Oscar.
Thats not to take anything away from him because he's been a very good fighter but he's not the super elite. You could easily argue that he got stopped by Hopkins, lost twice to Shane, lost to Sturm, lost to Tito, lost to Sweet Pea, lost to Ike, and I think there's another one Im missing. Now you could definatly go alot of different ways in those fights but there are alot of people who think that he lost all of them and he's never ever had that dominant performance in a big fight like all the greats have. You could argue that he had it against Vargas but he was halfway shot by then.
Gran Campeon
May 5th is too far away for me though....I cant wait for this fight! lol
Comment