Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: WBC Prez Tabs Lopez as Undisputed, Justifies 3 Champions at Lightweight

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Comments Thread For: WBC Prez Tabs Lopez as Undisputed, Justifies 3 Champions at Lightweight

    Mauricio Sulaiman, president of the World Boxing Council, openly admits that it's very confusing to the fans when there are three WBC champions in a single weight division. Teofimo Lopez is the WBC's 'Franchise' champion at lightweight, Devin Haney is the WBC's full champion, while Ryan Garcia recently captured the WBC's interim-title this past Saturday with a knockout of Luke Campbell.
    [Click Here To Read More]

  • #2
    Told them Haney H0es their boy was being played.

    Comment


    • #3
      As long as this continues the sport will be a laughing stock, this is just ridiculous. If you want to hold all three titles than you simply need to fight more often to defend them. If you can’t do than then give up the damn belt

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by jonnyc420 View Post
        Told them Haney H0es their boy was being played.
        Everybody is being played. Morris walks away with sanctioning fees from all these fighters while 2 fighters claim to be the full champ and the fans bicker.

        That greasy slob is laughing. We were all in agreement that the franchise belt was a curly turd of a belt that didn't mean anything but it hasn't took long to split the fans on it.

        Worst thing is, as soon as the REAL Real one ends up around the waist of a popular fighter the narrative will soon change.

        In my opinion Lopez should be undisputed for defeating Loma but at the same time Haney was pushing for the Loma fight he wasnt pushing to be handed that belt. I don't wana lose sight of what the real belt is and who holds it so Haney holds it.

        All it takes is Lopez to face Haney and it can all be settled and we are all back on the same track.

        Comment


        • #5
          The WBC has zero credibility......period.

          Comment


          • #6
            No, 3 titles in one boxing union is too many. You have all these unions that cheapen this sport. The belt makers are making a killing. What, something like 200 belts out there? Really now.

            Comment


            • #7
              Bad for the sport to have a ton of belts, no need for this.

              I don't care if the intention is to make the biggest fights happen, this doesn't help to the credibility of the sport.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by jonnyc420 View Post
                Told them Haney H0es their boy was being played.
                Haney wasn’t really played, the Wbc played themselves. That franchise title was created for Canelo and they set these ****** rules to cater specifically to him. Then they gave loma the same title to not make it seem like a canelo title, but now want to change the rules because they realize how ****** they look by having Haney as a champ while Lopez is clearly the one deserving of that belt. Franchise title never should’ve existed to begin with.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Wow, so now the 'bc is following the 'ba.......we should ban both orgs, somehow. Keep only ibf and 'bo. Or hell, only the ibf.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    WBC Cares

                    It’s only about the sanction fees. It’s a rip-off. That’s why the WBC always try’s to get involved in big fights. It’s a family business. I bet they own the company that makes the belts too. If they truly cared about the sport, they would clean this garbage up. 💰💰💰💰💰💰💰 that’s what the WBC is all about.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP