Comments Thread For: Canelo: To Me, Callum Smith Is The Best At 168; That Motivates Me A Lot

[Shadoww702]

Well since it’s “opinion,” your lord and savior Breadman has Canelo #2, and he said so himself he wouldn’t be bothered if others have Canelo #1. So if Canelo beats Smith, is that a better win than Crawford vs Brook? Breadman has consistency. Should Alvarez win, Bread might actually put Canelo in #1. Which means all the times you joked about me for Canelo in the mailbags changes its course? Are u ready for that

Why do you bother with that clown??? He thinks Canelo should have at LEAST 4 losses. And is the WORST boxer in history....Have to wonder if his parents are cousins???

[Jab jab boom]

Well since it’s “opinion,” your lord and savior Breadman has Canelo #2, and he said so himself he wouldn’t be bothered if others have Canelo #1. So if Canelo beats Smith, is that a better win than Crawford vs Brook? Breadman has consistency. Should Alvarez win, Bread might actually put Canelo in #1. Which means all the times you joked about me for Canelo in the mailbags changes its course? Are u ready for that

you get dumber every time you change your username. I didn’t critique you having Canelo #1 p4p, I just don’t agree with it and think Crawford is better than Canelo. You feel Crawford’s resume is weak while I think Canelo lost 3 more times than what’s on his record and judges bailed him out. My critique of canelo continues to be that he minimizes risk consistently by picking 35 and older opponents and or picking guys coming off poor performances. I also think he’s a ped cheat , a diva and he gets favorable and borderline corrupt treatment from the wbc and judges. All of those things hurt your woman parts and makes you go on a 1000 post spree trying to change everyone’s mind. P4p is the least of my debates as I said, it’s all opinion.

[Jab jab boom]

4 losses?? Why not 6?? Why not have him 0-99???

You giving out imaginary losses is kinda funny. You clearly don't know how to judge boxing.

canelo fans arguing about bad judging in boxing? Lmaoo. Even you acknowledged canelo lost the first fight vs ggg. Meanwhile of 50 press row scorecards in the rematch , only 2 had canelo winning. I also think he lost to Lara. None of those were unpopular opinions. So that’d be 4 losses IMO. If you have a different opinion, fine but I personally don’t give 2 shets about your opinion because you’re a liar and clearly a bi polar cuck. So stop your emotional rants ya phag.

[markther]

It’s going to be a really good fight. Callum stands at 6-3 with a 78 inch reach and a 70% stoppage percentage. Canelo’s is 5-8 with a 70 inch reach and a 64% stoppage percentage.

Callum has never been hurt or dropped and he seems to have a pretty strong chin. Callum has everything working in his favor, Canelo’s ring rust, being the naturally bigger super middleweight, height and reach. Long tough night for Canelo.

[Coreytrevor12]

Who ranked Ali or Leonard as 1# in their divisions after they lost? As far as Robinson (Who was the #2 Welterweight at the time) his ranking at Welterweight was unaffected by the Lamotta loss because Lamotta wasn't a Welterweight, he came in over 160 for the Robinson fight

[daggum]

Muhammad Ali lost to Frazier yet he was still the best in the division. Ray Robinson lost Jake LaMotta yet he was still the best in the division. Ray Leonard lost to Duran yet he was still the best in the division. I am not even counting the fights where champions won a controversial decision and yet were considered the best in their division. Everyone can have a bad night ---even Michael Jordan.

ali was not the best after losing to frazier, frazier was. im confused.

[Thuglife Nelo]

Why do you bother with that clown??? He thinks Canelo should have at LEAST 4 losses. And is the WORST boxer in history....Have to wonder if his parents are cousins???

In the end they fold their cards

[#1PaperChamp]

canelo fans arguing about bad judging in boxing? Lmaoo. Even you acknowledged canelo lost the first fight vs ggg. Meanwhile of 50 press row scorecards in the rematch , only 2 had canelo winning. I also think he lost to Lara. None of those were unpopular opinions. So that’d be 4 losses IMO. If you have a different opinion, fine but I personally don’t give 2 shets about your opinion because you’re a liar and clearly a bi polar cuck. So stop your emotional rants ya phag.

Borat fans arguing about bad judging...Dervechenko says hi LMFAO

Pathetic trash ********** Borat stans

[Robi13]

I know boxing period.....which is why I know bulls*** when I hear it.

I agree with you... same here

[Drew Bundini Br]

I'm hearing Canelo will fight Spence at 160. Why doesn't Canelo fight the other 160 champ Charlo then?