Multi-weight champs vs. Undisputed champs? What is more impressive?

[kidbazooka]

I agree with that other poster.

It’s all about quality of opposition.

Sometimes there is only one elite belt holder while the other 3 suck so getting those belts don’t mean much same with divisions.

All about quality.

[kidbazooka]

Well lets put it this way he beat the best at 154 and no one at 160 or 168 beats him but 175 Beterbiev knocks him out

Betterbieve is a stiff robotic bum zero skill just a slow face first brawler who is a ko waiting to happen.

Canelo plays with that overrated bum.

[John Locke]

Who you beat, the level of competition is what's most important. Look at Crawford for example, 3 division champ, undisputed in one of them and he's yet to fight anyone above B level.

Broner, 4 division champ, but who did he beat to achieve it?

[Divine Hammer]

it depends. are u fighting one of the top guys in each of those 2-4 weight divisions???? are u undisputed in one of the toughest divisions?????

crawford became undisputed when 140 was at its weakest.

many guys become multiple weight champs by barely fighting anyone of note. look at broner and santa cruz. those guys barely fought any one of note and are 4 weight class champs.

[BangEM]

Neither. It all depends on who you beat to achieve either.

Some divisions are too weak and any bum can become undisputed there. Same for jumping weight classes to fight average belt holders.

[BangEM]

it depends. are u fighting one of the top guys in each of those 2-4 weight divisions???? are u undisputed in one of the toughest divisions?????

crawford became undisputed when 140 was at its weakest.

many guys become multiple weight champs by barely fighting anyone of note. look at broner and santa cruz. those guys barely fought any one of note and are 4 weight class champs.

140 is still very weak. Same as 154 which is slightly better. None of the undisputed in both divisions is impressive.

And we've all seen Canelo jump multiple weight classes to fight the weakest links.

So neither and it all depends on the level of competition.

[Luilun]

Betterbieve is a stiff robotic bum zero skill just a slow face first brawler who is a ko waiting to happen.

Canelo plays with that overrated bum.

That's a possibility

[Citizen Koba]

Absolutely depends on the opponent's fought to there, but in general I'd say undisputed. On the whole it's easier to cherry pick weak champs at several division than to fight all the top guys in one. Also many division champs are dudes who started young and grew through divisions. I don't give special credit to a dude just for reaching physical maturity or drawing less.

[FLY TY]

Well lets put it this way he beat the best at 154 and no one at 160 or 168 beats him but 175 Beterbiev knocks him out

I disagree. He has fought neither Charlo bro, or Andrade...at 168, I'd love to see him against Plant or Benavidez. It's not enough to say he beats all these guys, but doesn't have to fight them.

[Boxing-1013]

Opponent levels matter.

This, this is the only real answer lol