Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Persoon: I Respect The Result, Katie Taylor Deserved To Win

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Squared.Circle
    replied
    Originally posted by 1hourRun View Post


    I ask the boxingscene a simple question : was Delfine Persoon given a fair chance to win a decision in the UK with all British judges, considering the controversial results of the first contest? How would the score look if all three judges were from Belgium? A simple question I ask.

    Below I note the names of these three English-criminals that decided Taylor vs. Persoon II.

    John Latham 94-96 | Victor Loughlin 93-98 | Mark Lyson 94-96

    Katie Taylor has officially become the most overrated and protected champion in the sport of boxing, worse than Vasily Lomachenko ; a complete fraud!

    It breaks my heart to see Delfine Persoon putting her body and soul in these two legacy defining fights only to get robbed in the end. I nearly cried when I read the title of this thread, you deserved better Delfine Persoon.
    And that fully explains every comment you post on this forum...you're an actual man bítch

    You post that video like it proves a point. What it really shows is Persoon landing about 10 out of 40+ punches. And even at that, it was the last round and one her most successful throughout the fight lol post ones from the first few rounds where Persoon hardly landed a punch while Taylor countered with clean shots. Or ones from the mid-rounds where Persoon, again, was throwing 20 punches to land 4 or 5 (because Taylor was slipping, sliding, blocking and parrying) while Taylor was landing the cleaner shots.

    Scoring a fight is not subjective. Ineffective aggression (not landing punches because the opponent's defence, in one way or another, is nullifying those attacks) is not a scoring criteria. Effective defence (blocking, parrying and making your opponent miss) is a scoring criteria. You probably think De La Hoya beat Mayweather for shít sake

    A robbery is something like Wilder vs. Fury one, where Fury was the clear winner, without a doubt, yet Wilder gets gifted a draw. A close fight that can be scored by one or two points either way, or a draw, is not a robbery.

    You need to put aside your sensitive wiccle emotions when you comment. They literally make you look like the biggest and most deluded ninny-pants hater on the entire forum it's embarrassing.

    Leave a comment:


  • marvin douglas
    replied
    Originally posted by Nash out View Post
    I thought she win handily, as do many other people and pundits. I wonder if she watches it back she'll think she won quite comfortably. May be concussed from Katie Taylor's headbutts.

    I thought Taylor was poor. Running, ducking, being hit flush in the face and landing one fast combo per round is not her being like Mayweather. One thing is clear, Serrano needs to KO her.

    Exactly. I found it hard to give katie a single round. Persoon backed he up the whole fight and katie didn't counterpunch very well. Call it like it is -- a robbery.

    Leave a comment:


  • NachoMan
    replied
    Originally posted by 1hourRun View Post


    I ask the boxingscene a simple question : was Delfine Persoon given a fair chance to win a decision in the UK with all British judges, considering the controversial results of the first contest? How would the score look if all three judges were from Belgium? A simple question I ask.

    Below I note the names of these three English-criminals that decided Taylor vs. Persoon II.

    John Latham 94-96 | Victor Loughlin 93-98 | Mark Lyson 94-96

    Katie Taylor has officially become the most overrated and protected champion in the sport of boxing, worse than Vasily Lomachenko ; a complete fraud!

    It breaks my heart to see Delfine Persoon putting her body and soul in these two legacy defining fights only to get robbed in the end. I nearly cried when I read the title of this thread, you deserved better Delfine Persoon.
    Sounds like you didn’t actually see the fight then since you cried when you read about the result. So interesting. You’re so certain that Persoon got screwed by criminal judges yet you didn’t even see the fight. I thought Persoon got screwed in the first match, but agree that KT was the winner yesterday, I saw both live.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ricky12
    replied
    Originally posted by 1hourRun View Post




    It breaks my heart to see Delfine Persoon putting her body and soul in these two legacy defining fights only to get robbed in the end. I nearly cried when I read the title of this thread, you deserved better Delfine Persoon.
    Nice comments and I agree completely.

    I was highly impressed with Persoons effort.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ricky12
    replied
    Originally posted by Toffee View Post
    I'm the same. Most women's sport is just a lesser version of the same men's sport. But in boxing, it's just another division.

    Where I disagree is I thought the Taylor Persoon fight was crap. Persoon made it a wrestling match and the far superior boxer was lucky to escape with her belts. On another day those judges reward basic effort and it will be down to the 2 minute rounds that allow the women to go full tilt for 20 minutes with 9 breaks.
    What I like about women's boxing as opposed to women's football is the same purist concept like the mens. Person v person.Its why as you maybe aware Katie Taylor choose boxing over football despite being a very promising footballer eg played for Republic of Ireland youth .

    Leave a comment:


  • Nash out
    replied
    I thought she win handily, as do many other people and pundits. I wonder if she watches it back she'll think she won quite comfortably. May be concussed from Katie Taylor's headbutts.

    I thought Taylor was poor. Running, ducking, being hit flush in the face and landing one fast combo per round is not her being like Mayweather. One thing is clear, Serrano needs to KO her.

    Leave a comment:


  • sterling
    replied
    Originally posted by 1hourRun View Post


    I ask the boxingscene a simple question : was Delfine Persoon given a fair chance to win a decision in the UK with all British judges, considering the controversial results of the first contest? How would the score look if all three judges were from Belgium? A simple question I ask.

    Below I note the names of these three English-criminals that decided Taylor vs. Persoon II.

    John Latham 94-96 | Victor Loughlin 93-98 | Mark Lyson 94-96

    Katie Taylor has officially become the most overrated and protected champion in the sport of boxing, worse than Vasily Lomachenko ; a complete fraud!

    It breaks my heart to see Delfine Persoon putting her body and soul in these two legacy defining fights only to get robbed in the end. I nearly cried when I read the title of this thread, you deserved better Delfine Persoon.
    Wo! Loma is not protected, if anything he is avoided because he is so dam hard to fight.

    Leave a comment:


  • Toffee
    replied
    Originally posted by Ricky12 View Post
    Great fight.Huge respect to Persoon. I actually thought she won the fight as did Johny Nelson the Sky sport boxing pundit at ringside.

    Iam not really into some womens sport eg football but womens boxing I can hack and actually looked forward to the Taylor v Persoon rematch more than than the main event of Whyte v Povetkin.

    Didnt disappoint. Huge respect to both fighters.
    I'm the same. Most women's sport is just a lesser version of the same men's sport. But in boxing, it's just another division.

    Where I disagree is I thought the Taylor Persoon fight was crap. Persoon made it a wrestling match and the far superior boxer was lucky to escape with her belts. On another day those judges reward basic effort and it will be down to the 2 minute rounds that allow the women to go full tilt for 20 minutes with 9 breaks.

    Leave a comment:


  • 1hourRun
    replied


    I ask the boxingscene a simple question : was Delfine Persoon given a fair chance to win a decision in the UK with all British judges, considering the controversial results of the first contest? How would the score look if all three judges were from Belgium? A simple question I ask.

    Below I note the names of these three English-criminals that decided Taylor vs. Persoon II.

    John Latham 94-96 | Victor Loughlin 93-98 | Mark Lyson 94-96

    Katie Taylor has officially become the most overrated and protected champion in the sport of boxing, worse than Vasily Lomachenko ; a complete fraud!

    It breaks my heart to see Delfine Persoon putting her body and soul in these two legacy defining fights only to get robbed in the end. I nearly cried when I read the title of this thread, you deserved better Delfine Persoon.

    Leave a comment:


  • RossW
    replied
    When the Sky commentary team are going for the opponent you know Taylor is lucky to hold on to the titles!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X
TOP