Comments Thread For: ESPN Boxing Team Split On Handling Of UFC COVID-19 Testing Protocol

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46539
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: ESPN Boxing Team Split On Handling Of UFC COVID-19 Testing Protocol

    Even with both under the same ESPN umbrella, boxing and UFC remain kissing cousins at best-and their respective leaders, Top Rank founder and Hall of Fame promoter Bob Arum and UFC president Dana White nothing less than bitter enemies.
    [Click Here To Read More]
  • ShoulderRoll
    Join The Great Resist
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2009
    • 56168
    • 10,136
    • 5,032
    • 763,445

    #2
    That non-disparagement clause by the UFC is out of line.

    If people have issues with the testing protocol then they should be allowed to speak freely.

    Comment

    • Rcralas
      Up and Comer
      Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
      • Mar 2018
      • 40
      • 1
      • 0
      • 12,564

      #3
      What are they talking about UFC was not the first to stage no audience shows...WWE and AEW hasn't stopped... And even though is "not real" they are still making contact

      Comment

      • Dasmius Shinobi
        Zenobia
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Aug 2017
        • 2984
        • 160
        • 295
        • 74,570

        #4
        Excellent update article.

        I knew there was a catch in those contracts with this clause thing, but never like this. UFC is still going apparently, after 3 of their UFC cards. Boxing is late, but their planning is going to be better compared to the other sports that begun.
        Last edited by Dasmius Shinobi; 05-20-2020, 03:27 PM. Reason: Corrections.

        Comment

        • rocktop
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Jul 2019
          • 121
          • 2
          • 0
          • 5,423

          #5
          Originally posted by ShoulderRoll
          That non-disparagement clause by the UFC is out of line.

          If people have issues with the testing protocol then they should be allowed to speak freely.
          i dont like ufc's contracts but disparagement literally means lying negative comments so the fighters can comment if the ufc was doing something bad and there was proof. A non disclosure clause would of been bad this is nothing its just protecting from disgruntled employees making up stuff to get money.

          Comment

          • ShoulderRoll
            Join The Great Resist
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2009
            • 56168
            • 10,136
            • 5,032
            • 763,445

            #6
            Originally posted by rocktop
            i dont like ufc's contracts but disparagement literally means lying negative comments so the fighters can comment if the ufc was doing something bad and there was proof. A non disclosure clause would of been bad this is nothing its just protecting from disgruntled employees making up stuff to get money.
            But if they say anything negative about the testing protocols that could be construed as "disparaging" the UFC.

            Companies need to be transparent with things like this instead of trying to keep what they do a secret.

            Comment

            • rocktop
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Jul 2019
              • 121
              • 2
              • 0
              • 5,423

              #7
              Originally posted by ShoulderRoll
              But if they say anything negative about the testing protocols that could be construed as "disparaging" the UFC.

              Companies need to be transparent with things like this instead of trying to keep what they do a secret.
              if its false yes but if its true and have proof you can talk about it. Its an ahole move but the clause isnt that big of a deal court cases work exactly like that anyway so as long as you have proof your golden. Plus i gurantee you espn , top rank, matchroom are all going to make boxers sign waivers as well so they dont get sued.

              Comment

              • Pigeons
                Banned
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Jun 2013
                • 14750
                • 1,211
                • 714
                • 37,430

                #8
                Originally posted by ShoulderRoll
                That non-disparagement clause by the UFC is out of line.

                If people have issues with the testing protocol then they should be allowed to speak freely.
                Then they can sit on the sidelines and talk all the trash they want. Don't want to sign the contract? Find a 9-5. It's a free country.

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP