Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Daily Bread Mailbag: Canelo-De La Hoya, Crawford-Porter, More

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Comments Thread For: Daily Bread Mailbag: Canelo-De La Hoya, Crawford-Porter, More

    The Daily Bread Mailbag returns, with Stephen "Breadman" Edwards tackling topics such as Shawn Porter vs. Terence Crawford, an Oscar De La Hoya vs. Canelo Alvarez dream match, thoughts on Josh Taylor, Sugar Ray Leonard vs. Thomas Hearns, and much more.
    [Click Here To Read More]

  • #2
    Interesting read about the rock, paper and scissor style match-ups. Hagler, Hearns, Leonard & Duran. I never get sick of hearing those names.

    Comment


    • #3
      Josh Taylor just understands how to get it done

      This 1 million percent. Also Josh Taylor definitely won that fight, very close, but he was the winner. Great fight though.

      Comment


      • #4
        Breadman absolutely correct. What good comes from T Crawford beating Porter so bad, to the point where pops Porter would have to throw the towel in to save his kid after washed up Thurman & clueless Spence battled Porter for 12?

        Comment


        • #5
          Duran last long even with too much drinking in his heyday. And Pacman last long even with little sleep in playing billiards for money from sun down to sun up in his early years as champ.

          Comment


          • #6
            Breadman the clown

            BREAD THE CLOWN SHOULD WORRY ON HIS FIGHTER NOT SOME LAME BREADBAG

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Curtis2 View Post
              Breadman absolutely correct. What good comes from T Crawford beating Porter so bad, to the point where pops Porter would have to throw the towel in to save his kid after washed up Thurman & clueless Spence battled Porter for 12?
              Yes because Crawford has proven hes better than Spence & Thurman at ww...Oh wait

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by kushking View Post
                Yes because Crawford has proven hes better than Spence & Thurman at ww...Oh wait
                Well, they can prove, 2 lineal, 1 time undisputed, 5-0-5kos (i include diaz) at welterweight isn't that good. we are still waiting.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Pretty good read. The only thing I would disagree with is the statement about Porter and Crawford fighting everyone. Porter has proven to fight the elite, win or lose, while Crawford has not proven he's willing and able. Crawford talks a lot ( usually when he's promoting upcoming fight) but does little else to prove he's willing to jump in with the best, he called out Porter, Porter answers and Crickets from Crawford and then says he's not interested. I think Crawford is very skilled but he has wasted his Career fighting paper champs and no-names. So at this point I don't really know if Crawford is willing to take chances and be great, at 32 time is running out.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by kushking View Post
                    Yes because Crawford has proven hes better than Spence & Thurman at ww...Oh wait
                    I’m telling you, this apologists come up with every excuse on the book to excuse x fighter for ducking.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP