Comments Thread For: Rolls: I Don't Think Gennadiy Golovkin Is Slowing Down At All

[BIGPOPPAPUMP]

NEW YORK Steve Rolls doesn't think Gennadiy Golovkin is slipping. Based on Golovkin's most recent performance and training footage Rolls has watched, Rolls views Golovkin as very similar to the elite middleweight he has been since bursting upon the American boxing scene nearly seven years ago. Thus the unproven Rolls, who's just two years younger than the 37-year-old Golovkin, doesn't consider age an advantage for him entering their 12-round super middleweight match Saturday night at Madison Square Garden (DAZN).
[Click Here To Read More]

[elfag]

Rolls is 35 years old. He has zero chance of beating 37 year old GGG.

This is not a young buck with a chance to upset the champ (or former champ for GGG).

This is a "tune up" fight. Thats odd because GGG claims he beat Canelo and was robbed. If you beat the best fighter in the world, then why do you need a tune up? Why not fight someone worthwhile next fight?

[Lomadeaux]

Rolls is 35 years old. He has zero chance of beating 37 year old GGG.

This is not a young buck with a chance to upset the champ (or former champ for GGG).

This is a "tune up" fight. Thats odd because GGG claims he beat Canelo and was robbed. If you beat the best fighter in the world, then why do you need a tune up? Why not fight someone worthwhile next fight?

What percentage did Ruiz have?

[douglas marvin]

Rolls is 35 years old. He has zero chance of beating 37 year old GGG.

This is not a young buck with a chance to upset the champ (or former champ for GGG).

This is a "tune up" fight. Thats odd because GGG claims he beat Canelo and was robbed. If you beat the best fighter in the world, then why do you need a tune up? Why not fight someone worthwhile next fight?

Yeah, but he didn't turn pro until 2011, when he was 26. So there is no wear on him. And he can fight.