Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Berchelt-Vargas Rematch Peaked At 1,099,000 Viewers

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • killakali
    replied
    Originally posted by Gambino View Post
    The networks don't give a damn how many old people watch your show. Top Rank overperformed in most key demographics which is why it was ranked 7th on cable. PBC on the other hand underperformed in most key demographics and was barely in the top 10 for primetime on broadcast. It was out of the top 10 once you include late night(SNL) and daytime sports.

    In the adults 18-49 category which is the most important category PBC only had 16% more viewers. The Berchelt-Vargas card also had a 5% higher rating in that category than PBC's previous card, Garcia-Granados. Berchelt doing better ratings than a potential PPV headliner is embarassing for PBC.
    This^^^ that WBF IBO IBA dude is cringeworthy having to come into a top rank thread to try and defend pbc. He’s so triggered.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bobby Deez
    replied
    Originally posted by bigdunny1 View Post
    What's funny is NASCAR on FOX's smaller cable channel FS1 drew drastically higher ratings then PBC did on FOX the bigger network with more viewers available to watch.

    NASCAR starting at 7:35PM did 2.177M viewers on FS1
    PBC starting at 8PM did 1.385M viewers on FOX

    That should NOT happen where your cable channel sister station beats out your main Network station on prime time with both airing live sports no less.
    Damn, dude.

    Leave a comment:


  • ShoulderRoll
    replied
    Originally posted by bigdunny1 View Post
    They finished 7th compared to all 100+ cable channels for the entire day and 3rd best for their specific time slot. Where as FOX finished dead last for their time and dead last for any program on Network TV. I don't think either numbers for ESPN or FOX are great. I would say ESPN is just ok while FOX are below avg. For Network TV you should be doing 2M avg viewers not 1.4M. And for Cable TV these fights should be doing 1M viewers NOT 740K. HBO did these type of numbers last year and ESPN is in much more homes and not a additional subscription cost on top of basic cable.




    So Dragon Ball Super, NASCAR on FS1, and the UFC Prelims all got better ratings than Top Rank Boxing?

    Leave a comment:


  • Worick
    replied
    Originally posted by Detroit29 View Post
    So this went head to head with PBC and lost by 1 million viewers? And nobody can say that Hurd and Williams are house hold names and they did 2 million homes. But but but PBC tho..will be dead in 2 years tho...tho..tho..tho...THO!!! #HAYMON #PBC
    Do you have tourette's?

    Leave a comment:


  • Detroit29
    replied
    So this went head to head with PBC and lost by 1 million viewers? And nobody can say that Hurd and Williams are house hold names and they did 2 million homes. But but but PBC tho..will be dead in 2 years tho...tho..tho..tho...THO!!! #HAYMON #PBC

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Haymon
    replied
    Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
    Good numbers based on what? Everyone was just saying how bad the PBC numbers supposedly were.

    ESPN is in 75% as many homes as Fox, but their show did half as many viewers as the PBC show.

    How can the PBC numbers be bad, but the ESPN numbers be good, if the ESPN show did half as many viewers?
    The networks don't give a damn how many old people watch your show. Top Rank overperformed in most key demographics which is why it was ranked 7th on cable. PBC on the other hand underperformed in most key demographics and was barely in the top 10 for primetime on broadcast. It was out of the top 10 once you include late night(SNL) and daytime sports.

    In the adults 18-49 category which is the most important category PBC only had 16% more viewers. The Berchelt-Vargas card also had a 5% higher rating in that category than PBC's previous card, Garcia-Granados. Berchelt doing better ratings than a potential PPV headliner is embarassing for PBC.

    Leave a comment:


  • Worick
    replied
    Those seem like pretty good numbers. At the bar i was at people kept asking about the danm ufc fight

    Leave a comment:


  • Worick
    replied
    Originally posted by bigdunny1 View Post
    They finished 7th compared to all 100+ cable channels for the entire day and 3rd best for their specific time slot. Where as FOX finished dead last for their time and dead last for any program on Network TV. I don't think either numbers for ESPN or FOX are great. I would say ESPN is just ok while FOX are below avg. For Network TV you should be doing 2M avg viewers not 1.4M. And for Cable TV these fights should be doing 1M viewers NOT 740K. HBO did these type of numbers last year and ESPN is in much more homes and not a additional subscription cost on top of basic cable.




    Lmao shut him up pretty quick

    Leave a comment:


  • bigdunny1
    replied
    What's funny is NASCAR on FOX's smaller cable channel FS1 drew drastically higher ratings then PBC did on FOX the bigger network with more viewers available to watch.

    NASCAR starting at 7:35PM did 2.177M viewers on FS1
    PBC starting at 8PM did 1.385M viewers on FOX

    That should NOT happen where your cable channel sister station beats out your main Network station on prime time with both airing live sports no less.

    Leave a comment:


  • bigdunny1
    replied
    Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
    Can we see how the ratings for ESPN's broadcast compared to other cable programs on at the same time?

    Like they always do when comparing PBC fights to other major network shows?
    They finished 7th compared to all 100+ cable channels for the entire day and 3rd best for their specific time slot. Where as FOX finished dead last for their time and dead last for any program on Network TV. I don't think either numbers for ESPN or FOX are great. I would say ESPN is just ok while FOX are below avg. For Network TV you should be doing 2M avg viewers not 1.4M. And for Cable TV these fights should be doing 1M viewers NOT 740K. HBO did these type of numbers last year and ESPN is in much more homes and not a additional subscription cost on top of basic cable.




    Leave a comment:

Working...
X
TOP