Comments Thread For: Dillian Whyte Formally Contests WBC Ruling on Wilder-Breazeale

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46545
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: Dillian Whyte Formally Contests WBC Ruling on Wilder-Breazeale

    Dillian Whyte remains one of the few notable heavyweights presently without a fight-unless you count the one to which he's presently attached his name. The top-rated contender has filed a formal appeal with the World Boxing Council (WBC), challenging a ruling that allowed Dominic Breazeale to be named as a mandatory contender for Deontay Wilder's title. The two will square off May 18 at Barclays Center in Brooklyn, New York, with the Showtime headliner formally announced last week.
    [Click Here To Read More]
  • DougalDylan
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jul 2017
    • 2275
    • 508
    • 30
    • 29,422

    #2
    Is Wilder wearing a dress or a skirt in that photo ?

    Comment

    • Kcvtr81
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • May 2017
      • 987
      • 32
      • 67
      • 17,488

      #3
      Good man dillian, *** those snakey ba$tard$ at the WBC, terrified wilder gets wrecked and the belt moves to the uk

      Comment

      • Robbie Barrett
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Nov 2013
        • 40891
        • 2,779
        • 667
        • 570,921

        #4
        Whyte should have been the mandatory not Breazeale. Any reasonable person would agree. Haymon has the WBC in his pocket though.

        Comment

        • JWHardin
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jan 2011
          • 1992
          • 62
          • 0
          • 31,494

          #5
          Just mention Luis Ortiz to Whyte and he will cry and shut up.

          Comment

          • _Rexy_
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jan 2018
            • 27934
            • 6,140
            • 3,585
            • 358,040

            #6
            He's challenging a ruling that allowed Breazelle to be #1 contender


            You mean the ruling thats always been there? Fight a final eliminator?

            Comment

            • Robbie Barrett
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Nov 2013
              • 40891
              • 2,779
              • 667
              • 570,921

              #7
              Originally posted by _Rexy_
              He's challenging a ruling that allowed Breazelle to be #1 contender


              You mean the ruling thats always been there? Fight a final eliminator?
              Breazeale is #4, Whyte is #1.

              Comment

              • P4Pdunny
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jul 2017
                • 8094
                • 143
                • 142
                • 58,715

                #8
                In the words of Whyte himself, "let's see what happens"

                Comment

                • Motorcity Cobra
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Mar 2016
                  • 32565
                  • 1,106
                  • 545
                  • 963,610

                  #9
                  The WBC **** the bed with this one. Breazeale was fighting Stiverne for the final eliminatior. Stiverne was mandatory at the time. Ortiz got popped, Stiverne fought Wilder instead. Breazeale then fought Molina to become mandatory.

                  How it got to the point where Whyte supposedly became a mandatory is the fault of the WBC.

                  Comment

                  • Zaxspeed
                    Up and Comer
                    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                    • Sep 2018
                    • 60
                    • 2
                    • 0
                    • 8,841

                    #10
                    Originally posted by _Rexy_
                    He's challenging a ruling that allowed Breazelle to be #1 contender


                    You mean the ruling thats always been there? Fight a final eliminator?
                    The basis for Whyte's claim is slightly different. The WBC called for Whyte - Breazeale eliminator to be made interim champion and mandatory challenger: Whyte took decisions on the basis of that mandate, and Whyte did not pull out of the mandated fight.

                    The WBC rules have lots of discretion and wriggle room though, I'd be surpised if he can make a lawsuit stick.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP