Ring magazine is NOT a WORLD TITLE no matter how bad you want it to be.

[bambam182]

Ring magazine is a title giving to the lineal champ, not a world champ. you can have the title and not be a world champ.

if you have a ring title, that does not mean you are a world CHAMP. why is this so hard for the pac-tards to understand?

[bambam182]

Ducking boys

[DreamFighter]

it is an award really. a a magazine isnt a boxing organisation, or else we'll be having a Whizzer n Chips and a JudgeDredd/2000AD boxing title next.

[IMDAZED]

It used to mean something.

[bambam182]

Only pac-yards think it’s a world title

[Boksfan]

Fury tards know.

[DuckAdonis]

Idc but that title is worth more than those paper ABC titles. You actually have to beat someone for that title most of the time

[Raggamuffin]

Ring magazine is a title giving to the lineal champ, not a world champ. you can have the title and not be a world champ.

if you have a ring title, that does not mean you are a world CHAMP. why is this so hard for the pac-tards to understand?

The lineal champion is the true champion. But I don’t recognize the Ring belt.

[New England]

four corrupt organizations per division, or a lineal championship based on who beat who going back through time?


it's not perfect, but you take the lineal title literally every single time.

[iamboxing]

gfy