Comments Thread For: WBC Prez Praises Vanes: He is Worthy Opponent For Golovkin

[Shadoww702]

like I have always said.....

pacfans should STFU about steroids..... and golovkin-fans should never criticize another fighters resume

That's what a SMART person would do! But then again Pac Tards and GGGOWARDS !!!! Dont have an ounce of self respect or pride.

[Shadoww702]

Too many ****ing excuses. 160 is stacked now and this **** is still fighting scrubs, even worse, this is ****ing Vanes. **** him.

Much respect! You sound exactly like I did when Pednelo pulled that Mexicans dont f around BS. I know it hurts. I'm a GGG fan as well. This really pisses me off also. We both know he chose the worst option available. This is gonna hurt his resume more then anything. Now his name is with worst mismatches in boxing HISTORY.

Were gonna Google rod Salka and mismatches and GGG vs. Vanes is gonna come up also.

[j.razor]

Not a fan of either guy (although I loved the first fight), but a lot of shade is being thrown at Golovkin like he's the reason he's having to find another opponent. Dude didn't fail a drug test 8 weeks out; tell you that.

“You look at his physique on the scales for the last Golovkin fight, everyone is already su****ious, and ever more so now. Having spoke to doctors, when we put a VADA random testing in process, previously we’ve done it with 8 weeks to go. The doctors have told me this is the biggest waste of time game. You need it 16 weeks out because a drug cheat will stop their cycle probably by 8 weeks...which is about the time that this has happened, which again don’t look great."
-Eddie Hearn

Stop making things up....We are mad that golovkin is weak in picking a weak opponent when there are good opponents to fight period.

[j.razor]

See?

Fights his IBF Mandatory (Wade) and gets criticized for it.

Doesn't fight his IBF Mandatory (Derevyanchenko) on less than a months notice, and gets criticized for it.

Also, Kell Brook weakest 147 lber? You must have missed the fact he beat Porter. He would also have beaten Thurman. Why don't you people ever hate on Eubank Jr. for losing his pen?



If he takes a bum after this fight, I'll side with you the haters (to an extent), but more than likely he won't. Just give it a rest already.

Thurman beats brook & you would still be happy if lil g fought another bum cuz you want him to look good cuz he aint....LMMFAO!

[Shadoww702]

like I have always said.....

pacfans should STFU about steroids..... and golovkin-fans should never criticize another fighters resume

I would like to ADD Loma fans crying about Salido's weight after dragging 1 guy up one weight class and another up TWO weight classes to that list.

[Shadoww702]

Stop making things up....We are mad that golovkin is weak in picking a weak opponent when there are good opponents to fight period.

Yeah there to fkn ****** to figure that part out. I always said GGG had the worst fans. Bunch of lil Paris Hilton wanna be's.

[TonyGe]

I didn't say that.

I never discussed Thurman before on this board actually, because I wasn't impressed by his fighting spirit at any point. But I watched most of his fights and respect his skills and know he would beat Brook. Brook is an okay fighter and that's it.

Was Brook ever the best welter champ?

I know you didn't say that and I'm not claiming you did. I said it. I was just using that as an example to make my point.

[TonyGe]

Much respect! You sound exactly like I did when Pednelo pulled that Mexicans dont f around BS. I know it hurts. I'm a GGG fan as well. This really pisses me off also. We both know he chose the worst option available. This is gonna hurt his resume more then anything. Now his name is with worst mismatches in boxing HISTORY.

Were gonna Google rod Salka and mismatches and GGG vs. Vanes is gonna come up also.

I think it's not going to hurt his resume at all. If in his next fight he doesn't fight a better boxer yeah it will.

[UNBIASED BOXING]

Bold: We don't know this. People were also saying he would beat Spence.

And, yes, I agree with the poster he was the weakest among the welter champs. He went life and death with Porter (his best win to date), and barely won a split decision.

I'll agree, it's unfair for me to claim he would beat Thurman. But claiming he went, "life and death" with Porter is ironic, considering Thurman's fight with Porter was much closer.

Weakest? In comparison to who? Danny Garcia? Jeff Horn? Or, shot Pacquiao before he fought Horn? Literally, besides Spence how are we calling him the weakest among the welterweight champions? The only fighter I'm not sure entirely who wins is a matchup between him and Thurman, but claiming the same that Thurman beats Brook isn't entirely accurate.

Eubank jr? is that not a worse opponent than Kell Brook?! Lmao you thinking E.U bum jr. is good , and Kell beating Thurman? are you high? ok he beat Porter but is Shawn even a great win?

Anyway, I don't even know what you are so upset about I said its a step up for 'lil G'.

I'm not sure if you're serious about Eubank Jr. Of course he's a better opponent, he's bigger and stronger than Brook.

Porter is Thurman's best win. Danny Garcia loses to Brook and Porter, he's an overrated welterweight.

[PunchyPotorff]

Vanes is an awkward fighter which is why he finds it difficult to get fights. Not the most talented in the sport, obviously, but one of the most awkward and difficult to fight. GGG will have some problems looking good in this one, but will likely figure out the puzzle just enough to either get a UD or a late stoppage.

But definitely not the worst last-minute opponent they could've found.