Comments Thread For: Kellie Maloney Defends Boxing's Use of Ring Card Girls

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Eff Pandas
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Apr 2012
    • 52129
    • 3,624
    • 2,147
    • 1,635,919

    #11
    Originally posted by kingstip9
    Why the **** are they trying to ban ring card girls lol. My god, sometimes you just shake your head at the **** people have a cry about
    Sh^t dude you ain't seen nothing yet. In 5 years some of these TR chicks will probably be saying they got forced into wearing camel toe shorts & holding signs with numbers on them & they just were scared to tell Arum no when he offered them a job.

    Sh^ts changing. I'm starting to feel like my grandpa probably did when women started working or other random historical changes went down. The pussificiation is happening I think. Hopefully it doesn't take all the way.

    Comment

    • New England
      Strong champion.
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2010
      • 37514
      • 1,927
      • 1,486
      • 97,173

      #12
      Originally posted by mlac
      You can thank Tony the Tiger for that. Poor frank had a breakdown after Price got sparked out in the rematch, he literally was his only hope after Lennox retired.

      Expect Parker to have the same effect on Eddie if he somehow KO's AJ.
      a 6 foot 5 Edwina in a wig soon come, maybe he can hook up with kellie then?


      they'll be hard pressed to turn that 11inch member into anything other than a detached giant penis. eddie hangs dong.

      Comment

      • Eff Pandas
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2012
        • 52129
        • 3,624
        • 2,147
        • 1,635,919

        #13
        Originally posted by Hmabshir
        Whether you agree with her or not she brings up a good point about personal choice. These girls aren’t forced to do this they choose.
        As we are seeing with this MeToo thing doe there is the angle of "I had no choice REALLLLLLLLY" type angle with some of this stuff. Go read the Louis CK & Aziz Ansari(?) stuff specifically.

        Louis politely asked b^tches if they'll watch him jack it. Girls said sure I'll watch you jack it. Watched him jack til he nut on his stomach without leaving. Decade or w/e later they got a problem with it.

        Aziz just trying to get some *****. Girl willingly sucks his **** (& may or may not have f#cked him idr) & now he's in the wrong.

        The boundaries with agreeing to do something together is changing right in front of us. If it shifts for good or if this is just a current trajectory that will return to "normal" eventually is the question. And idk if anyone has any idea yet.

        Comment

        • _Rexy_
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jan 2018
          • 27929
          • 6,140
          • 3,585
          • 358,040

          #14
          Originally posted by Eff Pandas
          As we are seeing with this MeToo thing doe there is the angle of "I had no choice REALLLLLLLLY" type angle with some of this stuff. Go read the Louis CK & Aziz Ansari(?) stuff specifically.

          Louis politely asked b^tches if they'll watch him jack it. Girls said sure I'll watch you jack it. Watched him jack til he nut on his stomach without leaving. Decade or w/e later they got a problem with it.

          Aziz just trying to get some *****. Girl willingly sucks his **** (& may or may not have f#cked him idr) & now he's in the wrong.

          The boundaries with agreeing to do something together is changing right in front of us. If it shifts for good or if this is just a current trajectory that will return to "normal" eventually is the question. And idk if anyone has any idea yet.
          That's why I'm on that Chappelle Show "sex contact & Non Disclosure Agreement" tip

          Comment

          • skinnystev
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jul 2013
            • 3963
            • 110
            • 0
            • 28,699

            #15
            some people have a need to try and take all the fun all the joy out of life

            Comment

            • -Johannes-
              GolovKING!
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Dec 2009
              • 2486
              • 202
              • 115
              • 9,438

              #16
              Originally posted by sterilizer
              I think they are a distraction, a silly one at it, for real boxing fans. A distraction geared maybe towards some men who most probably aren't real boxing fans, just casuals. To me, they are annoying and distracting, but to each their own, they appear very little during fight broadcasts, so they are almost irrelevant in my case, except for people who like to see fights live and want to listen to everything related to the fight, specially the corners between rounds and not listen to men cheering loudly and cat-calling at something completely irrelevant to a boxing fight.
              Do you have ADD? Casuals are the reason to boxing's success. A boxing hipster like you serves no real purpose to the sport. Sad but true bud.

              Also when you go to a live event you can't fucking listen to the corners even if you tried lmao. It's a minute bro relax it's a break to react to the round and talk about it with your buddies. That's how a real fan behaves after each round, I have never seen anyone complaining about the ring girls or call them a distraction wtf
              Last edited by -Johannes-; 02-02-2018, 04:33 PM. Reason: before anyone skips the point to point out the mistake lol

              Comment

              • SteveM
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Feb 2015
                • 8710
                • 2,455
                • 1,266
                • 35,733

                #17
                Originally posted by sterilizer
                I think they are a distraction, a silly one at it, for real boxing fans. A distraction geared maybe towards some men who most probably aren't real boxing fans, just casuals. To me, they are annoying and distracting, but to each their own, they appear very little during fight broadcasts, so they are almost irrelevant in my case, except for people who like to see fights live and want to listen to everything related to the fight, specially the corners between rounds and not listen to men cheering loudly and cat-calling at something completely irrelevant to a boxing fight.
                If you are in the crowd you're not going to hear much of what the corners are saying. If you are watching on tv the mics are blocking out crowd noise.

                Comment

                • SteveM
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Feb 2015
                  • 8710
                  • 2,455
                  • 1,266
                  • 35,733

                  #18
                  Originally posted by kingstip9
                  Why the **** are they trying to ban ring card girls lol. My god, sometimes you just shake your head at the **** people have a cry about
                  It's like having an argument about deckchairs on the deck of the Titanic after it's started to sink.

                  Comment

                  • SteveM
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Feb 2015
                    • 8710
                    • 2,455
                    • 1,266
                    • 35,733

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Eff Pandas
                    Sh^t dude you ain't seen nothing yet. In 5 years some of these TR chicks will probably be saying they got forced into wearing camel toe shorts & holding signs with numbers on them & they just were scared to tell Arum no when he offered them a job.

                    Sh^ts changing. I'm starting to feel like my grandpa probably did when women started working or other random historical changes went down. The pussificiation is happening I think. Hopefully it doesn't take all the way.
                    Your grandpa was probably confused by women's lib. What we are seeing now is the opposite - a new era od puritanism ****ed up by ultra-*******ism in case of LGBT movement et al.

                    Think about it. You can go online to see **** on almost anything = ultra *******ism but you have people moaning about ring girls and Formula 1 grid girls - - that is hyper contradictory.

                    Over and beyond that - what happened to freedom of expression? What the **** happened is a precedent was set when it became illegal to say certain things/do certain things - like in Germany you can't do a **** salute. For sure it is undesirable to do that as it causes offence to feelings of many but then you get the same pretext used to ban ring girls = it causes offence to many.

                    My take is you either have full on freedom of expression or full on censorship. I have got nothing against LGBT people. But I don't want it thrown in my face.

                    So lets choose - full censorship or full freedom of expression because anything in between is too subjective.

                    Comment

                    • SteveM
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Feb 2015
                      • 8710
                      • 2,455
                      • 1,266
                      • 35,733

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Eff Pandas
                      As we are seeing with this MeToo thing doe there is the angle of "I had no choice REALLLLLLLLY" type angle with some of this stuff. Go read the Louis CK & Aziz Ansari(?) stuff specifically.

                      Louis politely asked b^tches if they'll watch him jack it. Girls said sure I'll watch you jack it. Watched him jack til he nut on his stomach without leaving. Decade or w/e later they got a problem with it.

                      Aziz just trying to get some *****. Girl willingly sucks his **** (& may or may not have f#cked him idr) & now he's in the wrong.

                      The boundaries with agreeing to do something together is changing right in front of us. If it shifts for good or if this is just a current trajectory that will return to "normal" eventually is the question. And idk if anyone has any idea yet.
                      I don't know (without googling) who Louis CK and Ansari are. Point is that what is socially acceptable is subjective and fragmented subjective and also rapidly changing.

                      It's true that ring girls etc is objectification of women. BUT .. banning it is restriction of a fundamental freedom ... freedom of expression.

                      In Sweden you now have to get verbal consent to have sex. ****ing madness. A guy has to actually ask "you want to ****?" because if he doesn't the woman can claim **** later. All this because women are being ****d left right and center ... or think they are.

                      Yet in UK all current **** cases are being re-evaluated because quite a few recnt cases it turns out the woman had stated on socila media that she liked the guy or similar and that info was never passed to the defence attorney.

                      Let boxing fans decide if they want ring girls.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP