Comments Thread For: Uzcategui: Andre Dirrell Won't Last Beyond 3 Rounds in Rematch!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46539
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: Uzcategui: Andre Dirrell Won't Last Beyond 3 Rounds in Rematch!

    On May 20th, Jose Uzcategui (26-2) appeared to be on his way to capturing his first world title when he landed a three punch combination as the bell sounded to end the 8th round. His opponent, Andre Dirrell (26-2), went down face first and was unable to continue.
    [Click Here To Read More]
  • Andre_parker1
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Oct 2017
    • 2358
    • 99
    • 1
    • 29,434

    #2
    whoop that ass uzcategui...he deserved the win the first time but was unlucky with the bell sound..it will be easier this time around

    Comment

    • Shadoww702
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Sep 2015
      • 41176
      • 4,546
      • 2,938
      • 250,035

      #3
      Just don't do the fight again in Maryland or Michigan or you'll get jumped again. Go to Texas let them pull that sht down there.

      Comment

      • McNulty
        Hamsterdam
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • May 2007
        • 6576
        • 430
        • 348
        • 28,319

        #4
        Dirrel is a moron for fighting this guy again. He should avoid like the plague.

        Comment

        • Mammoth
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Sep 2016
          • 35712
          • 3,843
          • 3,386
          • 378,304

          #5
          I kinda wish this dude was fighting Benavidez instead...

          Comment

          • Evil_Meat
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • May 2006
            • 2217
            • 135
            • 228
            • 17,290

            #6
            Originally posted by McNulty
            Dirrel is a moron for fighting this guy again. He should avoid like the plague.
            Yeah he got KTFO last time out. Two in a row will end his career.

            Comment

            • BKM-
              05-
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jan 2006
              • 8639
              • 945
              • 1,095
              • 49,234

              #7
              Originally posted by Evil_Meat
              Yeah he got KTFO last time out. Two in a row will end his career.
              Will it end his career or will Andre act like it ended his career?

              Comment

              • Gary Coleman
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jul 2009
                • 3512
                • 1,043
                • 922
                • 13,777

                #8
                Add Dirrell to the "wasted talent" pool.

                Comment

                • Evil_Meat
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • May 2006
                  • 2217
                  • 135
                  • 228
                  • 17,290

                  #9
                  Originally posted by BKM-
                  Will it end his career or will Andre act like it ended his career?
                  It won't matter if it's physical or mental. If he gets KTFO again, I doubt he'll come back.

                  Comment

                  • knockoutkid
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 1957
                    • 46
                    • 9
                    • 11,429

                    #10
                    was it a blatent intentional punch after the bell cause often they are not intentional, I saw a gassiev fight end in a no contest because the ref deemed the punch after the bell was 'not intentional' , so maybe the right result would have been a no contest. Seem's like the ref made a mess of it.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP