Originally posted by kafkod
View Post
So Stiverne was ranked much higher than both and you don't value that? Why do those dudes who are also not that good deserve it and are quality but a guy like Duhaupus who became ranked after Wilder fought him or Molina after he beat Adamek did are not any good. Either they are all bad, all decent or all whatever they all essentially accomplish the same things in the sport.
Fighters make the ranking, rankings don't make the fighter and those guys are all fringe lower half guys that you can throw in a bag and pick out names because they re the same.
You can say Wilder has a nondescript dossier of names but don't go acting like anyone at heavy has really put in a lot of work, the top guy has 1 win of real quality which is against an aged former champion coming off a long lay off. Even if I want to include Fury he has one win over that same guy but earlier and did it first other than that all the guys are the exact same at heavy with who they beat.
I don't think Parker is worth a damn but if Joshua beats him he can say he has two decent wins then maybe he can start to talk. One win does not a career make~ that would also apply to Wilder should he beat Joshua btw
Comment