Originally posted by Metho_4u
View Post
If that happened, would it mean the Cavs won, just because they would call themselves champions, and just because their fans would gloat, and any time someone questioned their "victory," they would post pictures of Lebron with the trophy, or post screenshots of the official record book that shows the Cavaliers as 2017 champions?
"If we didn't win, then how comes this here says 2017 champions: Cleveland Cavaliers? How come we got THESE?" And then they post pictures of the 2017 NBA Finals rings on Lebron and J.R. Smith's fingers?
Would that make the "victory" real lol?
Na man. So just because a corrupt institution says something is true, and writes it in a book, doesn't mean it is. Corrupt institutions used to say black men were only 3/5 of a human being, but that didn't make it true.
Well I know all races are full human beings, which is much more important and something many on this forum using terms like "white devils" do not, and I also know the rules of boxing. Just because a corrupt ref invented his own rules on the night to ensure Ward "won," similar to the analogy I gave about a ref making Cleveland's baskets worth 30 point, doesn't mean Ward really won. Just because that corrupt commission will put "Ward TKO Kovalev 8th round" in their "official" book doesn't mean Ward really TKO'd Kovalev. Do you believe in closing your eyes and blindly following along with whatever the powerful tell you, or do you think enough of yourself to open your eyes and judge the truth for yourself?
Leaving aside the other 100 fouls, I saw the replay of the last punch with my own eyes, and it was clearly, irrefutably low. You can't win a punch on a foul, so already we know Ward did not actually win that fight. Anyone can pretend whatever they want, and when a large powerful group of people and institutions all agree to pretend the same thing together, they can be very convincing in making it appear to be the truth. But that doesn't make it so. They can make up new rules all the time to benefit their pocket books, but I happen to know the Marquess of Queensbury rules of boxing that have been around for over a century, as well as the ABC rules, and the other sanctioning body rules for the belts they fought for, all of which are quite similar, and all of which say you cannot KO your opponent with a foul.
So the better question for you is, are you still not over the fact that Ward still couldn't beat Kovalev, even with apparent PED acne all over his back?
But honestly I don't even want to jab back and forth with you like that. You're happy your guy "won," I'm disappointed that instead of clearing up the controversy after the robbery in the first fight that we got a corrupt non-result instead, but at the end of the day, it's over, so all we can hope for is better fights in the future with less corruption. And that's what I'm "not over," the fact that Ward-Bellew, if it happens, will be a ****ty fight, instead of a good one.
I just want to see the best fights. I have said repeatedly that I hope GGG moves up to 175 next year and fights the best guys, and I'm a GGG fan. You think that benefits GGG for him to fight 30 pounds heavier guys and quite possibly lose and then get **** on by all the racist haters? Of course not, but since I'm a real boxing fan, not just a GGG fan, I want to see amazing fights. That is the difference between a boxing fan who happens to like clean, entertaining fighters like GGG, and a fanboy or racial fan who wants to see their guy avoid all risks and win at all costs and even cheat, in order to make some sort of racial statement. I don't care about that ****, I just want to see the best fights. I think Kovalev-Usyk, Ward-Gassiev would be amazing fights at cruiserweight, and maybe the winners could fight. I think GGG-Beterbiev or GGG-Stevenson would be awesome at 175.
I just want to see the best fights and I've always been consistent about that. If Kovalev were trying to fight Tony Bellew I would say the exact same thing. Why fight a C-level guy who Kovalev would KO easily especially at cruiserweight when he could fight Stevenson or Beterbiev at 175, and those would be amazing fights for the fans, the exact opposite of Bellew? You should at least respect my consistency and objectivity if nothing else.
Comment