Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Lomachenko: Salido is a Step Back, But If The Promoters Agree...

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • rrayvez
    replied
    Originally posted by REYESdelBOXEO View Post
    If you think Loma would destroy SALIDO in a rematch that is irrelevant cause your boy Loma don't want to be caught alone in them woods with ORLANDO JASON VOORHEES SALIDO roaming around. Quack Quack Quack!
    I had SALIDO clearly winning against Lomachenko. The judges got it right , no contravercy here.

    SALIDO>Lomachenko

    Let's do the right thing and give SALIDO his Glory.
    If you think Lomachenko is a Special Fighter, that's fine, but surely the man who defeated that Special Fighter also deserves high praise as well , no? Unless , your bias?
    I give salido praise. The guy is one of the biggest overachievers ever in boxing. He's lost a bunch of fights but came back and won fights he wasn't supposed to win. I just disagree with you insisting that salido is greater than Loma because of a win where salido missed weight and fought dirty. I'm confident that a rematch goes differently, (not cause I'm a Loma fan, cause I'm not) , just because I know boxing. Salido lost a ton of early fights in his career and has had a better career than most of those guys who beat him. Assuming Loma stays healthy, I believe he goes in to have a more successful career than what salido had.

    Leave a comment:


  • bigjavi973
    replied
    Loma respects his daddy

    Leave a comment:


  • REYESdelBOXEO
    replied
    Originally posted by rrayvez View Post
    false, you said salido beat him fair and square. If you deliberately miss weight to gain an advantage, and go low multiple times during a fight, it's not necessarily fair and square. Yes salido got the win but I highly doubt that he'd come close to winning a rematch. He couldn't even beat Rocky Martinez and was dropped 3 times in 2 fights by him. Saying salido > than Loma because of a debatable win in Lomas 2nd pro fight is straight bias. Salido had loses in his record to fighters that he has a better legacy than, no?
    If you think Loma would destroy SALIDO in a rematch that is irrelevant cause your boy Loma don't want to be caught alone in them woods with ORLANDO JASON VOORHEES SALIDO roaming around. Quack Quack Quack!
    I had SALIDO clearly winning against Lomachenko. The judges got it right , no contravercy here.

    SALIDO>Lomachenko

    Let's do the right thing and give SALIDO his Glory.
    If you think Lomachenko is a Special Fighter, that's fine, but surely the man who defeated that Special Fighter also deserves high praise as well , no? Unless , your bias?

    Leave a comment:


  • Sweet_Science2
    replied
    [QUOTE=SniXSniPe;17686565]
    Originally posted by Sweet_Science2 View Post



    Why am I not surprised. You calling Walter's fight with Sosa a draw is a joke .

    These haters man, they don't even watch boxing fights
    The hype job 9 fights. 8-1 with a loss to fuucking Salido a dude with 13 L's facts.

    Crawford, Mayweather, Spence Jr, Ward, Rigo, Mikey Garcia, Thurman, The Charlo Brothers, would NEVER EVER have a competitive fight with a bum like Salido with double digit losses. The hype job got his ass whipped by him and loss. FACTS

    The hype job needs to stop being a pussie and avenge that ass whooping he took. Imagine a fighter you didn't like saying they don't need to avenge their loss? The fact remains the hype job has 9 fights - NO top 50 wins on his resume and a loss to a dude with 13 L's and you have him p4p.

    I can't make this shyt up LMAO.... Go watch golf or something

    Leave a comment:


  • UNBIASED BOXING
    replied
    [QUOTE=Sweet_Science2;17686382]
    Originally posted by SniXSniPe View Post


    Get your f@ggot ass outta here. Walters had a draw before his fight with that fuucking hype job and a YEAR layoff. Nobody had him in the top 50 dumb ass.

    Salido has 13 Losses and 4 draws. If Lomo was elite he would have added an L to that record instead Salido tapped that ass and put an L on his record pussie. Rigo would have dogged walk Salido, Mikey Garcia, ANY elite fighter would have beat the shyt out of Salido. If you think I'm lying let's see Salido vs Rigo and who would win pussie??
    EXACTLY!

    And I don't know the names because those fighters haven't done shyt idiot. YOU want the names to mean something to make that fraud ass hype job to seem legit and get more credit. Like I said NONE of them was in the top 50. By that logic anybody like Danny Garcia, Broner, should ALL be leaps and bounds ahead of this hype job. They have more wins, and Danny Garcia has WAY better names on his resume. But for some reason you are a praising a dude with 9 fights and a fuucking loss to Salido.

    Lomo is the top p4p??? LMAO. So a dude who HAS not beaten a fighter ranked in the top 50 and has 9 fights with a Loss to a dude with 13 L's and 4 draws is top p4p in your eyes?????? LMAO HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

    I can't make this shyt up LMAO


    Why am I not surprised. You calling Walter's fight with Sosa a draw is a joke .

    These haters man, they don't even watch boxing fights

    Leave a comment:


  • Sweet_Science2
    replied
    Originally posted by bigdramashow View Post
    at the end of the day, salido beat you. should try and avenge the loss, even if you do think its an easy nights work.
    For once I have to agree with you. As a competitor you would want to avenge that loss and clear the air. He sounds scared and unsure.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sweet_Science2
    replied
    [QUOTE=SniXSniPe;17682565]
    Originally posted by Sweet_Science2 View Post

    Walters isn't a top 50 probably because he lost to Lomachenko. Fact is, he was before. You mad?

    You don't even make a compelling arguement. How many losses has Salido had in the past 7 years? When did the majority of his losses occur... oh wait, he started boxing professionally as a young teenager with a minimal/no amateur career and racked up the majority early on. Try again. We know the numbers only matter when it suits your biased needs

    And lmao, just cause you don't know the names doesn't mean they aren't any good. Stay salty af.

    I can pull up a list of elite boxers who all highly rate Lomachenko and aren't full of biased hate (like you), so at the end of the day YDKSAB and let your bitterness--- I'm going to assume at seeing a white boy succeed get to you. How mad you must be that Lomachenko is probably going to be here for a few more years

    Have fun in your little lalaland, meanwhile, Lomachenko is staying as a top P4P fighter for a while. I can't imagine how angry at life you must be seeing him succeed.


    Let me guess, all the pros and knowledgeable names in boxing are wrong and you're right, LOL. Talk about delusional or just so downright stupid

    Get your f@ggot ass outta here. Walters had a draw before his fight with that fuucking hype job and a YEAR layoff. Nobody had him in the top 50 dumb ass.

    Salido has 13 Losses and 4 draws. If Lomo was elite he would have added an L to that record instead Salido tapped that ass and put an L on his record pussie. Rigo would have dogged walk Salido, Mikey Garcia, ANY elite fighter would have beat the shyt out of Salido. If you think I'm lying let's see Salido vs Rigo and who would win pussie??
    EXACTLY!

    And I don't know the names because those fighters haven't done shyt idiot. YOU want the names to mean something to make that fraud ass hype job to seem legit and get more credit. Like I said NONE of them was in the top 50. By that logic anybody like Danny Garcia, Broner, should ALL be leaps and bounds ahead of this hype job. They have more wins, and Danny Garcia has WAY better names on his resume. But for some reason you are a praising a dude with 9 fights and a fuucking loss to Salido.

    Lomo is the top p4p??? LMAO. So a dude who HAS not beaten a fighter ranked in the top 50 and has 9 fights with a Loss to a dude with 13 L's and 4 draws is top p4p in your eyes?????? LMAO HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

    I can't make this shyt up LMAO

    Leave a comment:


  • Madison boxing
    replied
    at the end of the day, salido beat you. should try and avenge the loss, even if you do think its an easy nights work.

    Leave a comment:


  • rrayvez
    replied
    Originally posted by REYESdelBOXEO View Post
    Salido beat Lomachenko that is a fact.

    You just seem to always have a problem with Mexican fighter's and never give them any credit plus you seem to never be happy with any fights, your the one that seems like a loser. I am always happy with the sport & always look forward to great fights whether a Mexican is fighting or not.
    false, you said salido beat him fair and square. If you deliberately miss weight to gain an advantage, and go low multiple times during a fight, it's not necessarily fair and square. Yes salido got the win but I highly doubt that he'd come close to winning a rematch. He couldn't even beat Rocky Martinez and was dropped 3 times in 2 fights by him. Saying salido > than Loma because of a debatable win in Lomas 2nd pro fight is straight bias. Salido had loses in his record to fighters that he has a better legacy than, no?

    Leave a comment:


  • Banko Villas
    replied
    Lomachenko should just fight him. Then he has avenged all losses in both his amateur career and pro career.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X
TOP