Golovkin -175 Canelo +137 LMAO

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mlac
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2014
    • 20360
    • 1,635
    • 1,491
    • 210,093

    #51
    Originally posted by lizard_man
    You guys are the ones saying jacobs is twice the size of canelo. Not me.

    Or did you mean jacobs is taller than canelo? Which one is it?
    yeah because the guy was obviously being totally literal....he REALLY thought jacobs was 9 foot tall!!!

    Comment

    • lizard_man
      Undisputed Champion
      • Jul 2008
      • 2598
      • 370
      • 20
      • 48,631

      #52
      Originally posted by mlac
      yeah because the guy was obviously being totally literal....he REALLY thought jacobs was 9 foot tall!!!
      So what did he mean? That jacobs is 4" taller?

      Comment

      • soul_survivor
        LOL @ Ali-Holmes
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jun 2013
        • 18949
        • 623
        • 473
        • 65,236

        #53
        Originally posted by HeadShots
        why do they list height and reach?
        some idiots seem to forget this

        Canelo is shorter, doesn't have the reach of most mw and will have to really throw it at GGG to make a difference.

        People forget Brook is taller than Canelo.

        Comment

        • mlac
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2014
          • 20360
          • 1,635
          • 1,491
          • 210,093

          #54
          Originally posted by lizard_man
          So what did he mean? That jacobs is 4" taller?
          are you dim?

          Comment

          • muslimer12
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Mar 2013
            • 1049
            • 41
            • 19
            • 15,320

            #55
            Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
            Tyson was considered small because he was usually outweighed. Having a shorter height and reach was advantageous to his fighting style where he'd get inside and rip hooks to the body, head and uppercuts.
            Fail post, fail troll, fail at life

            Comment

            • koolkc107
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Nov 2012
              • 4251
              • 218
              • 3
              • 59,059

              #56
              Originally posted by Thraxox
              You forgot height in reach. Skill and chin plays a role but Jacob's height and reach was the one that got him to lean away from GGG's punches. Canelo doesn't have that, and especially the legs of Jacobs which was able to keep throwing while moving.

              Jacobs had every tools on his arsenal to beat GGG, he had size, he had power, he had skill, he had chin (Now we know Jacobs isn't chinny.) and especially determination to beat GGG. Yet he still didn't pull it off (Regardless of your opinion if Jacobs beat him or not.) Either that speaks of GGG's skill or it speaks of Jacobs.

              We have measured how GGG goes against canelo, we now know that GGG won't get knock out. But Canelo is completely unknown in the Chavez fight to measure up on anything.
              I didn't forget anything.

              The height and reach of Jacobs are part of the non applicable extrapolation I mentioned.

              And IMO Jacobs DID pull it off, but nothing close was going to derail the mega-fight and it was close- enough where you can make a case for Lil g, I suppose.

              And no, we don't know Lil g won't get KTFO, because we don't know how he reacts to getting constantly pounded to the body, which Canelo will undoubtedly try to do.

              If successful, Saul could definitely stop Lil g late.

              But again, the two question I asked will determine who wins.

              Canelo has to answer both, while all Lil g needs is one of them to go his way.

              He is still the one who has been fighting and taking punches from bigger men for a longer time.

              Comment

              • muslimer12
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Mar 2013
                • 1049
                • 41
                • 19
                • 15,320

                #57
                Originally posted by NaijaD
                There's no weight limit at HW though so that's not exactly a relevant example considering Tyson would be considered small compared to someone like Lennox Lewis who is 6'5 and 245 pounds or a Frank Bruno. No one would have said Tyson was small compared to Holyfield though now would they??
                Holyfield was a natural cruiser/small HW too, so i dont get what you are saying. And still tyson was smaller than him too.

                Tyson was considered small in nearly every fight he was in, not just the lennox one lol Tyson outweighed guys like Ali, but ALi is still considered bigger.

                Its pretty simple, and pretyy dumb to even debate

                Comment

                • Robbie Barrett
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Nov 2013
                  • 40891
                  • 2,779
                  • 667
                  • 570,921

                  #58
                  Originally posted by muslimer12
                  Fail post, fail troll, fail at life
                  No explanation?

                  Shorter reach is an advantage on the inside. This is a fact, basic common sense really.

                  Comment

                  • NaijaD
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jan 2011
                    • 3444
                    • 204
                    • 215
                    • 30,256

                    #59
                    Originally posted by muslimer12
                    Holyfield was a natural cruiser/small HW too, so i dont get what you are saying. And still tyson was smaller than him too.

                    Tyson was considered small in nearly every fight he was in, not just the lennox one lol Tyson outweighed guys like Ali, but ALi is still considered bigger.

                    Its pretty simple, and pretyy dumb to even debate
                    Ali weighed 215..... Tyson weighed 218, that is a minuscule difference for HWs so yes height and reach would determine who is bigger.

                    But at lower weights it doesn't work that way, for instance would you say Paul Williams is bigger than Canelo or Golovkin?? I wouldn't personally. Would you say Postol is bigger than Shawn Porter??

                    Comment

                    • lizard_man
                      Undisputed Champion
                      • Jul 2008
                      • 2598
                      • 370
                      • 20
                      • 48,631

                      #60
                      Originally posted by NaijaD
                      Ali weighed 215..... Tyson weighed 218, that is a minuscule difference for HWs so yes height and reach would determine who is bigger.

                      But at lower weights it doesn't work that way, for instance would you say Paul Williams is bigger than Canelo or Golovkin?? I wouldn't personally. Would you say Postol is bigger than Shawn Porter??
                      These dumb cucks think height determines who the bigger fighter is. Paul Williams is bigger than tyson to them cuz he is taller and has a longer reach.

                      JACOBS TWICE THE SIZE OF CANELO DOE!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP