Golovkin -175 Canelo +137 LMAO
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
I didn't forget anything.You forgot height in reach. Skill and chin plays a role but Jacob's height and reach was the one that got him to lean away from GGG's punches. Canelo doesn't have that, and especially the legs of Jacobs which was able to keep throwing while moving.
Jacobs had every tools on his arsenal to beat GGG, he had size, he had power, he had skill, he had chin (Now we know Jacobs isn't chinny.) and especially determination to beat GGG. Yet he still didn't pull it off (Regardless of your opinion if Jacobs beat him or not.) Either that speaks of GGG's skill or it speaks of Jacobs.
We have measured how GGG goes against canelo, we now know that GGG won't get knock out. But Canelo is completely unknown in the Chavez fight to measure up on anything.
The height and reach of Jacobs are part of the non applicable extrapolation I mentioned.
And IMO Jacobs DID pull it off, but nothing close was going to derail the mega-fight and it was close- enough where you can make a case for Lil g, I suppose.
And no, we don't know Lil g won't get KTFO, because we don't know how he reacts to getting constantly pounded to the body, which Canelo will undoubtedly try to do.
If successful, Saul could definitely stop Lil g late.
But again, the two question I asked will determine who wins.
Canelo has to answer both, while all Lil g needs is one of them to go his way.
He is still the one who has been fighting and taking punches from bigger men for a longer time.Comment
-
Holyfield was a natural cruiser/small HW too, so i dont get what you are saying. And still tyson was smaller than him too.There's no weight limit at HW though so that's not exactly a relevant example considering Tyson would be considered small compared to someone like Lennox Lewis who is 6'5 and 245 pounds or a Frank Bruno. No one would have said Tyson was small compared to Holyfield though now would they??
Tyson was considered small in nearly every fight he was in, not just the lennox one lol Tyson outweighed guys like Ali, but ALi is still considered bigger.
Its pretty simple, and pretyy dumb to even debateComment
-
Comment
-
Ali weighed 215..... Tyson weighed 218, that is a minuscule difference for HWs so yes height and reach would determine who is bigger.Holyfield was a natural cruiser/small HW too, so i dont get what you are saying. And still tyson was smaller than him too.
Tyson was considered small in nearly every fight he was in, not just the lennox one lol Tyson outweighed guys like Ali, but ALi is still considered bigger.
Its pretty simple, and pretyy dumb to even debate
But at lower weights it doesn't work that way, for instance would you say Paul Williams is bigger than Canelo or Golovkin?? I wouldn't personally. Would you say Postol is bigger than Shawn Porter??Comment
-
These dumb cucks think height determines who the bigger fighter is. Paul Williams is bigger than tyson to them cuz he is taller and has a longer reach.Ali weighed 215..... Tyson weighed 218, that is a minuscule difference for HWs so yes height and reach would determine who is bigger.
But at lower weights it doesn't work that way, for instance would you say Paul Williams is bigger than Canelo or Golovkin?? I wouldn't personally. Would you say Postol is bigger than Shawn Porter??
JACOBS TWICE THE SIZE OF CANELO DOE!Comment

Comment