Golovkin -175 Canelo +137 LMAO

[HeadShots]

You're seriously ******ed.

Dropping someone has nothing to do with having more shot selection.

if fighter A can drop world class competition with a variety of shots.


and fighter B can't.


then fighter A has a better selection of shots. period.



Canelo is a shoeshiner.

[Robbie Barrett]

you can be 200 lbs at 5'5. that is going to be a disadvantage for you.



am I arguing with manlets again?

Nope. On the inside having shorter height and reach is usually an advantage.

[senna1985]

chavez jnr "golovkin punches a lot harder than Canelo and that was sparring"

golovkin would of knocked chavez the f7ck out yesterday within round 5

[Robbie Barrett]

if fighter A can drop world class competition with a variety of shots.


and fighter B can't.


then fighter A has a better selection of shots. period.



Canelo is a shoeshiner.

No he doesn't, that would mean he has more power not more shot selection.

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

This is why I continuously call you a hypocrite. GGG beat Jacob's as convincingly as Ward best Kovalev. Yet this reality seems to go over your head.

GGG should be the slight favorite. Canelo is too skilled to he outclassed by anyone other than the greatest fighter of his generation

Manny Pacquiao? That fight never happened and never will.

[muslimer12]

In boxing it is. Fighters are separated by weight, not height and reach.

ydksab.

Height and reach def make a big difference in size. Tyson was considered small as a HW cuz of those two things, not cuz of weight.

[HeadShots]

Nope. On the inside having shorter height and reach is usually an advantage.

"Ya but on the inside having shorter height and reach is usually an advantage." - Robbie Barrett


























[IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/xUPGcEq7GMCnzgMprO/*****.gif[/IMG]

[Robbie Barrett]

ydksab.

Height and reach def make a big difference in size. Tyson was considered small as a HW cuz of those two things, not cuz of weight.

Tyson was considered small because he was usually outweighed. Having a shorter height and reach was advantageous to his fighting style where he'd get inside and rip hooks to the body, head and uppercuts.

[Robbie Barrett]

"Ya but on the inside having shorter height and reach is usually an advantage." - Robbie Barrett


























[IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/xUPGcEq7GMCnzgMprO/*****.gif[/IMG]

This is well known to most boxing fans.

[NaijaD]

ydksab.

Height and reach def make a big difference in size. Tyson was considered small as a HW cuz of those two things, not cuz of weight.

There's no weight limit at HW though so that's not exactly a relevant example considering Tyson would be considered small compared to someone like Lennox Lewis who is 6'5 and 245 pounds or a Frank Bruno. No one would have said Tyson was small compared to Holyfield though now would they??