Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

If golovkins such an overrated hype job then why is nobody giving jacobs a chance?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by Scott. Weiland View Post
    Jacobs h2h Canelo try tell me Canelo wins...
    cotto alone is all you need.. when the *** did danny jacobs become better than canelo on this board? On Dec 17th?

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by LoadedWraps View Post

      He's got nothing. Canelo has proven nothing other than the fact that if put in the position to unify against the undisputed champion of a division, he will drop the belt like a pair of pants and head for the hills.
      Can you blame Canelo ? I think we're on the same page here, I honestly believe a crushing victory over Quillin holds you in higher regard than a guy who hasn't a solitary victory at the weight unless of course you consider a guy who weighed 153 before the fight he lost at 155 a middleweight victory, which technically I suppose it is but still I hold hold a crushing 1st round KO win over Quillin higher than I do a razor tight points decision victory over Cotto for Canelo.

      Jacobs is a far more dangerous opponent than Canelo will ever but still neither provide a stern challenge for GGG at 160, that's a given.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by HanzGruber View Post
        cotto alone is all you need.. when the *** did danny jacobs become better than canelo on this board? On Dec 17th?
        Jacobs crushed Quillin at 160 in a round, Canelo beat Cotto in a tight affair at 155. You're telling me the Cotto victory holds more weight than the Quillin victory ?

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by HanzGruber View Post
          clearly.. still dont see how that somehow makes jacobs better than canelo all the sudden.. he doesnt even sniff the top 10 pfp unless he beats GG
          Put them in the ring together and you'll see where I'm coming from.

          Canelo ain't top 10 for ****...if he is it just shows how irrelevant and inaccurate top 10's are.

          Comment


          • #45
            That's why we're now left wondering about the justification of Jacobs' asking price. He deserves $4 mil doe. Turns out that this is another no hoper just wanting to cash in.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by Scott. Weiland View Post
              Jacobs crushed Quillin at 160 in a round, Canelo beat Cotto in a tight affair at 155. You're telling me the Cotto victory holds more weight than the Quillin victory ?
              I never thought we'd be on the same side of an issue.

              This canelo **** is getting out of hand.

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by PRINCEKOOL View Post
                Golovkin is not overrated but......

                The 160 pound division is devoid of any real major talent! the only fighter stylistically who has a chance of beating Golovkin at this stage in his career is Chris Eubank Jr, because he has genuine natural athleticism! you know attributes such as spatial awareness, hand to eye co-ordination, speed and above average agility. These are the fundamental attributes that you need to excel in most sports in varying degrees! (But not always in a sport like boxing).......as-long as you have courage and bravery which are talents in themselves, you can have some success in this game.

                Boxing is the type of sport, that sometimes can give average people a chance at glory (The working class man!) people that may have not excelled at any other athletic discipline in their entire life! and the 160 division is example of that in my opinion.

                Apart from Golovkin and Chris Eubank Jr, there are very few gifted athletes/fighters in the division.
                chris eubank jr has no chance whatsoever in my opinion mate. Stylistically hes one of the easiest nights work for golovkin, his defence is shocking, almost amateurish, know hes got a good chin but you cant just eat golovkins shots, maybe able to for a couple of rounds but the face is soon going to get busted up badly. Might be a good fight for 2 or 3 rounds but thats about it. And if ggg did by some chance lose the exchanges im pretty sure he could outbox eubank behind his jab, if saunders was able to

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by bigdramashow View Post
                  chris eubank jr has no chance whatsoever in my opinion mate. Stylistically hes one of the easiest nights work for golovkin, his defence is shocking, almost amateurish, know hes got a good chin but you cant just eat golovkins shots, maybe able to for a couple of rounds but the face is soon going to get busted up badly. Might be a good fight for 2 or 3 rounds but thats about it. And if ggg did by some chance lose the exchanges im pretty sure he could outbox eubank behind his jab, if saunders was able to
                  That sounds like GGG.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by Isaac Clarke View Post
                    Jacobs is no better than the Murrays and Lemieuxs Golovkin has fought. B-Level.
                    Since GGG crushes them, that makes him A-level, right?

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by Kigali View Post
                      That sounds like GGG.
                      the guy with 345-5 record, world champ, olympic silver? I know i said amateur but that was a slang term for basic, not as in he has the defence of a top amateur. I know you are a hardcore golovkin hater, been doing the gig for a long time now, but even you arent going to tell me golovkins defence is worse than eubanks surely?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP