Comments Thread For: WBC's New Rule - Fighter's Father Can NOT Be Chief Second

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Motorcity Cobra
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Mar 2016
    • 32565
    • 1,106
    • 545
    • 963,610

    #1

    Comments Thread For: WBC's New Rule - Fighter's Father Can NOT Be Chief Second

    WBC pass ruling that will prohibit fathers from being chief-second to their son


    Matt Christie
    December 13, 2016

    AT their Annual Convention today, the WBC passed a ruling that will prohibit fathers being chief-second to their son in WBC-regulated contests. The reasoning – delivered by President Mauricio Sulaiman – behind the move was over concerns that the father may not act in the best interest of their son if he’s in a difficult fight, and may let the bout go on longer than necessary.

    While no commencement date was announced, it could have implications on the March 4 unification showdown between WBC welterweight champion Danny Garcia – famously trained by his father, Angel Garcia – and WBA boss, Keith Thurman. It is not clear if the WBA’s involvement would allow the ruling to be enforced.

    Other partnerships this could affect include Floyd Mayweather Jnr and Snr, should “Money” ever return, and Chris Eubank Jnr and Snr – who today announced an ITV pay-per-view event at super-middleweight – should they compete in WBC title fights.

    Fathers will still be permitted to train their sons for WBC-regulated contests, and allowed in the corner, but not as the chief cornerman and decision-maker.

    The motion was met with some resistance from the inaugural trainers committee that consists of Abel Sanchez, Joe Gallagher, Eddie Mustafa Muhammad, and Stacey McKinley, but was ultimately passed by the committee.

    This is not the first time the WBC have discussed this ruling, with talk of enforcing it as far back as 2009.

    Read more at: http://www.boxingnewsonline.net/wbc-...-to-their-son/
  • Beercules
    Lounge POTY '17
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Aug 2013
    • 65183
    • 4,940
    • 7,203
    • 950,179

    #2
    But...why?

    Comment

    • -DSG-
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Nov 2009
      • 10949
      • 1,003
      • 99
      • 25,679

      #3
      *** the WBC!

      Comment

      • Jsmooth9876
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jan 2014
        • 12209
        • 2,297
        • 365
        • 72,745

        #4
        Wbc are a bunch of jerk offs.... maybe Danny shouldn't pay them their sanctioning fee then... I'm sure they'll "come to an agreement" $$$

        Comment

        • HanzGruber
          STRAPMEUP
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Dec 2011
          • 29824
          • 1,069
          • 238
          • 81,632

          #5
          no it wont

          "Fathers will still be permitted to train their sons for WBC-regulated contests, and allowed in the corner, but not as the chief cornerman and decision-maker."

          as if theyre gonna say hey you cant say those words to him, during breaks

          Comment

          • Motorcity Cobra
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Mar 2016
            • 32565
            • 1,106
            • 545
            • 963,610

            #6
            Originally posted by HanzGruber
            no it wont

            "Fathers will still be permitted to train their sons for WBC-regulated contests, and allowed in the corner, but not as the chief cornerman and decision-maker."

            as if theyre gonna say hey you cant say those words to him, during breaks
            That's exactly what Angel is. Chief cornerman and decision maker.

            Comment

            • Motorcity Cobra
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Mar 2016
              • 32565
              • 1,106
              • 545
              • 963,610

              #7
              Originally posted by Beercules
              But...why?
              This is their reasoning:

              behind the move was over concerns that the father may not act in the best interest of their son if he’s in a difficult fight, and may let the bout go on longer than necessary.
              But it seems like the opposite would be true with your father in the corner. He'd act in the best interest of his son and be he main one who doesn't want to see his son hurt.

              Comment

              • siablo14
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jan 2006
                • 38828
                • 2,543
                • 12,186
                • 2,257,607

                #8
                Anyone thinks Garcia would pull out of the bout because of this?

                Comment

                • -DSG-
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Nov 2009
                  • 10949
                  • 1,003
                  • 99
                  • 25,679

                  #9
                  Originally posted by siablo14
                  Anyone thinks Garcia would pull out of the bout because of this?
                  No hell just drop the belt.

                  Comment

                  • Humean
                    Infidel
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jul 2013
                    • 3054
                    • 126
                    • 110
                    • 10,285

                    #10
                    The motives seem noble enough but it is a strange rule that doesn't seem particularly enforceable if you still allow a father in the corner.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP