Comments Thread For: Schaefer: Charlo is New Sheriff at 154, De La Hoya Won't Up Canelo

[brettWall]

Schaefer still has the nerve to use a GBP fighter's name despite having screwed the GBP owner.

[Kigali]

oscar prob wont let it happen, but he has one big reason "richard schafer", why in the world will oscar give the lotto winner ticket to a fighter that belongs to richard?? specially when that fighter brings little money to the table.... that being said, as a hardcore fan this is a fight many of us would love to see...

If Oscar thought Canelito could beat Schafer's fighter he'd make this fight in a second.

[Bronx2245]

Thank you!

[rrayvez]

And I had Trout/Charlo a draw. Neither one looked like they wanted to win. TERRIBLE boring fight. At least Canelo busted up Trout and Bambi-Legged him 3-4 times. The open scoring g killed that fight. And No Heart Trout did jack SHT knowing he was down. He was too SCURRED to go ALL-IN.....

ummm, I don't know about all that. While trout vs Charlo did suck, it's not like Canelo was all that impressive. That fight could've been a draw as well. He Bambi legged him once, not 3-4 times and trout out landed Canelo in that fight fairly comfortably. Either way, as I said Charlo is a more credible opponent than khan or beefy was and is a more credible opponent than Saunders.

[Kigali]

Thank you!

You actually said Brook and Charlo look the same size.

That's full ******ation..

[Tomjas]

You actually said Brook and Charlo look the same size.

That's full ******ation..

For once we agree

Furthermore, in the ring after their fight, GGG basically said that Brook was too small to trouble him and was not a MW

It's ridiculous that some people are still trying to pump up Brook's size - he is a big WW and would be, at best, an average sized LMW

Charlo is a 6 footer with a big frame ffs

[gmc_rfc_06]

who were the 2 best in the division? I assume 2 is Lara, and "beat" is a generous word when most saw him losing that fight. Either way, Charlo is better than Canelo's last 2 opponents combined so there's really no excuse to avoid him. Other than fear.

A prime Trout (when Canelo was 22) and Lara.

The majority of ringside press scored the Lara fight for Canelo so no, most actually saw him winning.

Then there's Cotto, Kirkland, Angulo, st*t even Smith is better than all but one of Charlo's opponents.

[brettWall]

You don't need Dela Hoya, Schaefer. All you need to do is make more meaningful fights based on the fighters you have. Why have all these fighters in your stable, then not make them fight each other? There's Lara vs Andrade, Andrade vs Charlo2, Lara vs Williams, etc.

[Bronx2245]

You actually said Brook and Charlo look the same size.

That's full ******ation..

I call it like I see it! The Brook that fought GGG was at least 170, and I believe Charlo was around 170 last Saturday!

[rrayvez]

A prime Trout (when Canelo was 22) and Lara.

The majority of ringside press scored the Lara fight for Canelo so no, most actually saw him winning.

Then there's Cotto, Kirkland, Angulo, st*t even Smith is better than all but one of Charlo's opponents.

but that still doesn't negate the fact that Charlo is still a more credible opponent than anyone Canelo has fought in yrs aside from Lara. Cotto was 10 yrs older and 20 pounds lighter, Kirkland was inactive and really just not very good, Angulo was washed etc. He should fight Charlo but he won't So i guess it's a pointless debate.