Is it true that Danny and Angel Garcia are supporting Trump?

[Mr.MojoRisin']

The US election is ****ing hilarious. Normally it's a straight-up choice between the racist, right-wing ********** and the non-racist, right wing ********, but this year we have the added bonus of an establishment criminal robot vs. a vile, mysogenistic megalomaniac. Pure entertainment.

You do know that the ********** party freed the ****** and the ********ic party wanted to keep slavery. There was a little argument over it called the American Civil War, wouldn't expect you to know about it. Only claimed the lives of 1,000,000 Americans.

[aldo5408]

You don't know me, dingleberry. And I ain't your "nukka." If we were "nukkas" I'd probably just choke you out for the lulz given your penchant for being a cvnt.

By the way, the San Jose Sharks are a collective of choke artist. Cong****, f*ggot.

By the way you're from Puerto Rico that's the nastiest lowest place on earth. Lmao we (america) run you
Guys. marine vet + PR+ idiot. You should be voting ******** so you can keep yur welfare plus bullshtt vet benefits

[E10Rifle]

You do know that the ********** party freed the ****** and the ********ic party wanted to keep slavery. There was a little argument over it called the American Civil War, wouldn't expect you to know about it. Only claimed the lives of 1,000,000 Americans.

Yes, yes, because 200-odd years ago is entirely relevant to the politics of today, and Mr 'Mexicans are rapists' is in no way a racist. Still, I'm glad you're proud to support someone who is literally incapable of speaking in complete, coherent sentences. He's definitely the chap I'd want in charge in a crisis. He knows all the best words, you see.

Out of interest, why do you have two casual racist terms as your username?

[bigdunny1]

You said yourself they are both bias so I don't go by either one. You brought them up.

bigdummy1 the walking contradiction.

The VAST majority of America hasn't even voted in the polls so they are inaccurate either way you look at it.

So then you don't trust either poll then just say that. But we both know if trump were winning in either poll especially the pro trump fox news poll you would care. Instead you trotted out the one no named poll that doesn't have trump losing. Problem it's not credible and even pro trump fox news long time ago stopped citing them. Like I said top polls have him not only losing but losing by landslide so don't post lies saying they are neck and neck on most polls when you can't find a single creditable not one that any of the top news outlets use. But hey you a trump supporter so it's easy to see why you are allergic to facts and logic.

[Mr.MojoRisin']

Yes, yes, because 200-odd years ago is entirely relevant to the politics of today, and Mr 'Mexicans are rapists' is in no way a racist. Still, I'm glad you're proud to support someone who is literally incapable of speaking in complete, coherent sentences. He's definitely the chap I'd want in charge in a crisis. He knows all the best words, you see.

Out of interest, why do you have two casual racist terms as your username?

Yet you can't provide evidence of Trump saying something racist. I want a video of him during this election saying something racist. If you can't produce it then concede.

So you support a party that was pro slavery? Makes no sense. There has been absolutely no change with ********s in the white house. We are 10x unsafer now than back in 2008. Racial tensions are higher than before ***** took office.

Trump isn't some God send man. He has a lot of bad qualities. But it is better than 4 more years of Hillary. The working class will be screwed with her. Trump is a better chance at the very least. I wish there was someone better than him running but there isn't.

******** have been saying that same thing to the inner cities for the last 60 years but here has been no change. Why? Mike Tyson endorses Trump, I guarantee if there was a racist thing that Trump had done Tyson would have jumped on him.

I'm of half Italian decent. I can use the terms Dago and Wop which aren't racist as Italian isn't a race. They were derogatory 100 years ago but today they are harmless. I don't care if anyone has a problem with that because I don't give a **** about political correctness. I do what I want not what doesn't offend other people.

[bigdunny1]

You do know that the ********** party freed the ****** and the ********ic party wanted to keep slavery. There was a little argument over it called the American Civil War, wouldn't expect you to know about it. Only claimed the lives of 1,000,000 Americans.

Damn you ****** yes 100 years ago **********s where the party of Lincoln and had the support of blacks. Then the 60s came and something called civil rights movement happened. Go read a book and find out why that changed and why 90% of blacks went to the ********ic party.

http://www.npr.org/sections/codeswit...y-in-the-1960s

Acting like blacks should support the **********s because of Lincoln and ignore everything that happened since is pure ignorance. These parties flip flopped in their focus of blacks more then 50 years ago. ********s don't focus as much as they should on blacks but they are better of the 2 when it comes to how they treat blacks and they nominated a black man to lead their party while the other side said show me your birth certificate ni gger lead by trump fyi.

[Mr.MojoRisin']

So then you don't trust either poll then just say that. But we both know if trump were winning in either poll especially the pro trump fox news poll you would care. Instead you trotted out the one no named poll that doesn't have trump losing. Problem it's not credible and even pro trump fox news long time ago stopped citing them. Like I said top polls have him not only losing but losing by landslide so don't post lies saying they are neck and neck on most polls when you can't find a single creditable not one that any of the top news outlets use. But hey you a trump supporter so it's easy to see why you are allergic to facts and logic.

No I would recognize that they are worthless. I also showed a link that had Trump winning on three, Hillary winning on another 3, and a tie on the other. Very far from bias and all it shows is that they are inaccurate.

There are no "top" polls they all only survey like 1% of the population.

[Mr.MojoRisin']

Damn you ****** yes 100 years ago **********s where the party of Lincoln and had the support of blacks. Then the 60s came and something called civil rights movement happened. Go read a book and find out why that changed and why 90% of blacks went to the ********ic party.

http://www.npr.org/sections/codeswit...y-in-the-1960s

Acting like blacks should support the **********s because of Lincoln and ignore everything that happened since is pure ignorance. These parties flip flopped in their focus of blacks more then 50 years ago. ********s don't focus as much as they should on blacks but they are better of the 2 when it comes to how they treat blacks and they nominated a black man to lead their party while the other side said show me your birth certificate ni gger lead by trump fyi.

"Damn you ******" "100 years ago Lincoln had the support of Blacks"

You do know Hillary was attacking ***** in her 2008 campaign right?
http://hotair.com/archives/2016/10/1...******-father/

That's all I need to say.

[bigdunny1]

No I would recognize that they are worthless. I also showed a link that had Trump winning on three, Hillary winning on another 3, and a tie on the other. Very far from bias and all it shows is that they are inaccurate.

There are no "top" polls they all only survey like 1% of the population.

No you posting polls that are so discredited that even a news outlet that is trying to push the trump agenda doesn't mention or use them. Post one poll that a major news outlet uses? You can't because all the top polls that anyone cares about and reports on has him losing by almost double digits. Again they only worthless because you can't find a creditable one to support your argument. I posted one from fox news who is only reporting the news slanted to **********s and favoring trump and even they have him losing by 7. They had Romney losing by 1 and he ultimately lost by 3 to *****. Losing by 7 in these type of polls but still winning the election is basically unheard of. 7 points is a landslide for a major party.

[bambam182]

Puerto Ricans think they're American and the strong white man trump will save them.

i like trumps hair.