Tweet
Burns, a three-weight world champion, was backed up by the Belarusian in the first three rounds, and couldn't counter with any effect until the end of the fourth.
[Click Here To Read More]
[Click Here To Read More]
-
-
He's right. Even if you had Burns winning, the scorecards show that Relikh never stood a chance of getting a decision no matter what. -
Eddie ****y hearns gave the judges the scores even before the fight!Comment
-
I thought that he wanted burns to win?Comment
-
Vintage home brewing, Ricky Burns ran all night long he was ineffective whilst running yet he magically was ahead on the scorecards It's not a case of us not seeing something its just a stitch up.
I think even a draw would have been a robbery, Relikh did more than enough to deserve the win, how can you find rounds for someone who ran all night, clinched and barely landed cleanly?
Ricky landed less, threw less, was controlled the entire fight It was a shocking performance from him.Comment
-
Always is the same ****in ****.
Is like the scorecards 117-111 and 116-112 in the fight of Roman Gonzalez vs Cuadras.
The kids of the promotions always are protected for the judges.
A ****** judge in Estrada vs Viloria saw win Viloria and the same in Canelo vs Floyd and the draw of C.Rose.
**** off with this.Comment
-
Maybe a 115-113, but not a 118-110. That's a joke. Very close fight, maybe even a draw.Comment
-
The usual UK screw job, you need a knockout to get a draw. Those cards were filled in last week.Comment
-
Says the man hailing from the "land of corporate corruption."Originally posted by Jim Tom View Post
Get some water in you son before the saltiness dries you into a crisp.Comment
-
yea as a uk fan the scorecards and refs are shocking here, think that was a reason brook took GGG fight cause if it was going to scorecards he was guaranteed a win. Pretty sure he was up on the scorecards despite only winning 1 roundComment
Comment