for instance, i get accused of being a golovkin fan just because i am a pacquiao fan. i also got accused for being a golovkin fan because i was critical of errol spence? that makes no sense to me. golovkin's alright to me, but i'm no where near considered a fanboy. i'll wait until he fights someone decent before i make that determination. in fact, i still think canelo would beat him, and i don't even like him either!
i think it goes like this. if you are a fan of this guy, according to them, you also also a fan of.....
[pacquiao fan]; golovkin, lomachenko, kovalev
[mayweather fan]; ward, wilder, stevenson, spence, crawford, lara
[dislike golovkin]; canelo, ward, lara, wilder, spence
[dislike ward]; kovalev, golovkin
the stereotyping must stop!
i think it goes like this. if you are a fan of this guy, according to them, you also also a fan of.....
[pacquiao fan]; golovkin, lomachenko, kovalev
[mayweather fan]; ward, wilder, stevenson, spence, crawford, lara
[dislike golovkin]; canelo, ward, lara, wilder, spence
[dislike ward]; kovalev, golovkin
the stereotyping must stop!

Comment