Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Abel Sanchez: No Pacquiao, I Want Crawford vs. Danny Garcia!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by Bronx2245 View Post
    Because no one knows Eduard Troyanovsky, and he's already beat Ricky Burns!
    Most people don't know GGG's opponents either, but they're pretty stoked to see a fighter try to become the first male undisputed champion since Jermain Taylor in 2006. And for the record, Crawford vs. Troyanovsky is a better fight than most people know. But for his legacy, Crawford should definitely attempt to do what Mayweather or Pac never did.

    Comment


    • #42
      Lamont really beat Garcia and he is a better fight for Crawford? TC will beat Garcia the way Garcia beat Paulie and Abel is still an id i ot with a good fighter..peace!

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by Dreamking View Post
        Garcia struggled with Guerrero and not the old "Ghost" either he struggled against this come forward brawler version of him. Now Crawford is leagues better than Guerrero and from what I've seen Garcia doesn't throw enough to keep Crawford off of him. It'll be another Postol fight.
        Crawford would try to box with Garcia the same way he did with postol. What makes you think he would be the aggressor against Garcia? Garcia can box, and most importantly he can **** a little. That itself would cause Crawford to be a little catious and fight from the outside. It would be another 50/50 fight where I believe Garcia would be the favorite.

        Comment


        • #44
          Honestly for me as a Crawford fan, I'd like to see him scoop up all the belts. Burns is easy money and Troyanovsky, he's a little difficult because of size and power, but has you seen.against postol he can adjust to any style. Besides when was the last time there was an undisputed champion at 140 pounds? There's history to be made at 140 for Crawford. 147 will still be there.

          Comment


          • #45


            Abel Sanchez your opinion is as important as ours on this forum. Nobody cares what you want!

            Comment


            • #46
              Why does NSB embarrass itself even publishing such a statement. Youve got a two division lineal champ continuing to go North and the K2 stable created an illusion with Mexican style beating Rubio and justifying gong north only if the "cash is right."

              Abel Sanchez is one of the biggest jokes in boxing probably just milking cash from Golovkin to invest more in his facilities.

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by DreamerUSA View Post
                What difference does it make if no one really knows who he is? He is the 3rd or 4th best 140lber out there. Yes he beat Burns and tbh I doubt Burns would fight him again anyways, but still would like to see him collect the belt if possible. Also would'nt mind seeing him dust off Lucas, or Orozco if he would ever actually make 140, Mikey is also on the comeback trail and that is a fight I would absolutely drool over. Crawford has potential fights at 140, but I guess we will see what happens.
                "What difference does it make...?" REALLY??? If you have the choice to fight the likes of Broner, Garcia, Pacquiao, and Thurman, or Eduard Troyanovsky, you go where the money is! Crawford has done enough @ 140, and if he wants the big fights, it's time to move on (unless Pacquiao wants the fight @ 140) ASAP!

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by SteveM View Post
                  That's because in Bob's eyes Broner is beatable and promotes a fight well. Demographics as well.
                  That's exactly right! Broner puts a$$e$ in seats! He's the perfect villain that everybody loves (and pays) to see!

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by buddyguns View Post
                    Most people don't know GGG's opponents either, but they're pretty stoked to see a fighter try to become the first male undisputed champion since Jermain Taylor in 2006. And for the record, Crawford vs. Troyanovsky is a better fight than most people know. But for his legacy, Crawford should definitely attempt to do what Mayweather or Pac never did.
                    "But for his legacy..." How about for his pockets??? Crawford should be seeking #1 Pacquiao, #2 Broner, or #3 Danny Garcia! He beats any of those 3, and his legacy and his pockets will improve significantly! You don't pass on a chance to fight Pacquiao for Troyanovsky!

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by Bronx2245 View Post
                      "But for his legacy..." How about for his pockets??? Crawford should be seeking #1 Pacquiao, #2 Broner, or #3 Danny Garcia! He beats any of those 3, and his legacy and his pockets will improve significantly! You don't pass on a chance to fight Pacquiao for Troyanovsky!
                      Hell no he shouldn't pass on Pac. That's his best path to building his stardom. But afterwards, he shouldn't rush to the welterweight division for Garcia either. The Broner and Garcia fights will still be there in two to three years (as long as Broner doesn't catch a 5-8 sentence).

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP