I would have been "happy" with any of the top ten at 168 so either of those guys is a good call
Groves would've been a logical choice as he has just beaten Murray who is regarded by many as GGG's best win
Anyway, the whole "once we move to 168, we'll never be back" excuse doesnt wash with me
Groves would've been a logical choice as he has just beaten Murray who is regarded by many as GGG's best win
Anyway, the whole "once we move to 168, we'll never be back" excuse doesnt wash with me
Comment