Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Golovkin To Fight in September - With or Without Canelo

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by Fetta View Post
    Eubanks wont put him in there yet, Jacobs is scheduled for July, Arum wont put Ramirez in there yet, But Saunders is ready to go but K2 has to open that checkbook.

    No mention of Lara who, looking at threads and social media, is the next logical choice if he wins this Sat.

    3 times a year...against who? We have already had enough no hopers
    Just explained....

    Comment


    • #12
      I'm predicting a Wladimir-esque run at MW when he collects all the belts. Each year he'll fulfil a mandatory, do a few voluntaries, and the only way it ends will be if he steps up to 168. He's blown away 2 of the hardest-hitting MWs (Stevens and Lemieux), with Jacobs to follow maybe in 2017, so after that... any other ****ers on the MW horizon? It'll be great to have an undisputed champion, but it'll be kinda bleak for the division if there's nobody else good enough to put up a challenge.
      Last edited by PittyPat; 05-20-2016, 05:44 PM.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by AneesMoha View Post
        He cannot fight Lara without the WBA stripping him for not fighting his mandatory. He can fight Saunders though.
        I'd love to see that happen, but I really don't think Saunders wants the fight.

        Comment


        • #14
          The WBA has made it clear that they will only chill on Golovkin vs Jacobs (the mandatory) if there is a Canelo fight.

          With that all but gone, look for the WBA to try to force the Jacobs fight.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by anthonydavid11 View Post
            I'd love to see that happen, but I really don't think Saunders wants the fight.
            Saunders sent out a tweet that he is ready and willing but we know how much that means really...still have a feeling Jacobs will be next to vacate.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by AneesMoha View Post
              Saunders sent out a tweet that he is ready and willing but we know how much that means really...still have a feeling Jacobs will be next to vacate.
              Haha. THREE titles won outside the ring? Man, I guess that will make for great selling points on HBO commentary. Haha. WWEish.

              Comment


              • #17
                in B4 the usual "but but but but Lara doe" idiots start chirping in.

                Edit: oops..... too late

                Comment


                • #18
                  Oh great, another no-hoper for Golovkin to feed on.

                  P4P #1 doe...

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by koolkc107 View Post
                    The WBA has made it clear that they will only chill on Golovkin vs Jacobs (the mandatory) if there is a Canelo fight.

                    With that all but gone, look for the WBA to try to force the Jacobs fight.
                    You think he fights or vacates? if he vacates the WBA intrim holder becomes mandatory

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by AneesMoha View Post
                      He cannot fight Lara without the WBA stripping him for not fighting his mandatory. He can fight Saunders though.
                      Coward. You know a Cuban exposes him.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP