Originally posted by about.thousands
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Golovkin declared Top 24 P4P of last 25 years
Collapse
-
Last edited by SilverMiles; 04-04-2016, 03:04 PM.
-
Originally posted by OnePunch View Postbecause they think somehow that makes them appear smart. Even though P4P has NOTHING to do with "resume", they imediately revert to chirping "but but but resume doe" because they can just look at Boxrec and not have to actually be able to analyze talent......
Comment
-
Originally posted by DreamerUSA View PostOf course its speculation. That is kind of the point of fantasy matchups, no? I don't see the point of overall resumes on a p4p list when the triangle theory rarely pans out in boxing. Just because a fighter was able to beat x, y and z. Does'nt mean he will beat A, B and C. Just seems pointless to me to have a ATG/Best and a p4p list if you are going to judge them in the same fashion.
As for his matchups. The only type of boxer I see giving him real problems is a fantastic inside fighter.
Comment
-
Originally posted by OnePunch View PostThe man sells out arenas on both coasts against unknown opposition, has the full support of HBO, and gets more and more popular every day. Id say YOU are the one who needs to "deal with it".....
GGG is a good fighter with a resume that leaves much to be desired ...get over it...he is unproven on the elite level
Comment
-
Originally posted by CatchweightKing View PostHow can you not include resume? A guy like loma looks sharper and better than say Danny Garcia, but Danny is higher pfp based on resume
What I mean is that for example Tito vs GGG will obviously never happen. There is no way to prove who would win if they fought. IMO ggg ghouls tito. Others might think Tito beats GGG. Its strictly OPINION, yet these clowns get all butthurt because ESPN had a different list than they did, and ESPN has a light-skinned guy on the list against their wishes lol. But in reality we all know what its REALLY about........Last edited by OnePunch; 04-04-2016, 03:33 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by OnePunch View Post"resume" obviously carries more weight on an "ATG" list, but P4P always has been, and always will be, simply subjective opinions as to who would win mythical matchups that obviously will never happen. People assess a fighters skillset & tools, and make their decisions. There is no right or wrong answers
What I mean is that for example Tito vs GGG will obviously never happen. There is no way to prove who would win if they fought. IMO ggg ghouls tito. Others might think Tito beats GGG. Its strictly OPINION, yet these clowns get all butthurt because ESPN had a different list than they did, and ESPN has a light-skinned guy on the list against their wishes lol. But in reality we all know what its REALLY about........
Comment
-
Originally posted by CatchweightKing View PostBut like I said. If loma was at 147 most would pick him to beat Garcia. But he's not higher pfp cause he only has 1 decent win. You have to prove it. It has nothing to do with gg being white cmon now. There's no way he's top 25, the "can't include resume" thing is dumb.
Comment
-
It's not as much racism as it is desperation, they wanna turn this guy into a star by any means necessary, even if it means making such a statement where as a reporter u can lose all credibility.
For some reason espn and HBO see superstar potential in GGG and they will say and do whatever it takes to hype him up even if it makes them sound like complete morons.Last edited by Dip_Slide; 04-04-2016, 03:49 PM.
Comment
-
Golovkin doesn't belong among the top 25 fighters in the last 25 years if he hasn't even fought one dangerous opponent.
Comment
Comment