Khan's Real Speed Revealed Briefly @ HBO Promo Shoot: (VIDEO)

[bluebeam]

They are only overhill the when Khan fights them right?

Garcia had problems with Zab, where as Khan beat a 10 times better and younger version of Zab

Broner struggled with a old Paulie, Khan beat a prime Paulie

Collazo dropped Ortiz and hurt Thurman, Khan dominated him

There is always a weird excuse not to give Khan any credit...

Floyd got no credit for beating zab in 2006. Why would khan get credit for beating zab 5 yrs after that?

Paulie has never beaten anyone? So what's the big deal about beating him?

Collazo beat ortiz. Big deal. Ortiz was coming off of a year and a half layoff and a broken jaw.

Barrera was 75 years old.

Mcloskey was a domestic bum

Diaz past prime

Oscar molina was And is a nobody.

Alexander was 2 fights removed from getting his ass handed to him by porter.

Maidana was a good win

Show me where I'm wrong on his resume

[FrankieBruno]

.........and you're a fcking moron.

Brain damage? Death? Are you really that fcking ******?

EVERY boxer is at risk of that when they step in the ring regardless who they fight. You think Khan deserves brownie points for doing his job?

Fck you idiot. "He has speed....." What else?

This is my last reply to you spastic

Khan is stepping in the ring with a guy who will considerably outweigh him, a guy who is a heavy puncher, thus the danger increases 10-fold.

As your favorite boxer says health comes first

[FrankieBruno]

Floyd got no credit for beating zab in 2006. Why would khan get credit for beating zab 5 yrs after that?

Paulie has never beaten anyone? So what's the big deal about beating him?

Collazo beat ortiz. Big deal. Ortiz was coming off of a year and a half layoff and a broken jaw.

Barrera was 75 years old.

Mcloskey was a domestic bum

Diaz past prime

Oscar molina was And is a nobody.

Alexander was 2 fights removed from getting his ass handed to him by porter.

Maidana was a good win

Show me where I'm wrong on his resume

So because some people chose not to give Floyd credit for beating Zab in 2006, Khan should get no credit? So you are basically doing what other people were doing to Floyd? what a mug you are

Using your logic we can discredit 99% of boxers resumes...are you a spastic?

We could rip apart anyones resume using that kind of dumb logic, from Thurman to Brook to Porter to Broner, Triple G, list goes on...

Why do you even watch boxing?

[hectari]

What good is his speed when there is no power behind those punches? I seen pacquiao shadow boxing faster than that and each shot looks like they could do damage, khan just throwing arm punches fast. And pacs speed flurries actually hurt guys when they hits them, khan needs to stop worrying about speed and focus on one **** timing with power, he can crack if he puts more effort on one shot, like how he dropped maidana with a hard body shot. For him to beat canelo he needs to throw pot shots and keep distance he has the superior reach and foot speed, if he throws those wild flurries he will ger caught

[bluebeam]

So because some people chose not to give Floyd credit for beating Zab in 2006, Khan should get no credit? So you are basically doing what other people were doing to Floyd? what a mug you are

Using your logic we can discredit 99% of boxers resumes...are you a spastic?


Why do you even watch boxing?

My point is floyd beat judah in 2006 and it wasn't considered a big win at the time.

So fast foward 5 years later. Why is judah all of a sudden a good win in 2011?

Judah was a washed up fighter in 2011, but you are trying to make it seem like he wasn't in your previous post

You said he was in his prime when Khan beat him. And danny struggled with a shot zab. I discredited your post by saying zab was considered shot when Floyd beat him 5 years earlier.

Don't boost him for khan's resume

[FrankieBruno]

My point is floyd beat a downside judah in 2006.

Why is judah all of a sudden a good win in 2011?

Judah is always a good win to have on your resume. You are over here talking as if he is Frankie Gavin or Jo Jo Dan

Khan fought him in 11 and dominated him, coming off a 5 win streak, one against Matthysse..and wasnt it Zab who handed Matthysse his first loss?

Danny fought him in 13 and those later rounds were tough

Stop downplaying every fighter, thats some clown ****, just because a boxer has a loss or 2, doesn't make him over the hill.

[Razcal26]

This is my last reply to you spastic

Khan is stepping in the ring with a guy who will considerably outweigh him, a guy who is a heavy puncher, thus the danger increases 10-fold.

As your favorite boxer says health comes first

Oh no....... I'm so sorry, I didn't know that was what Khan was doing you twat.

EVERY boxer who moves up in weight class knows the risks that awaits, but they know the greatness that can be achieved if they win. Khan ain't doing this for free.

This "fight" has been called a circus act and a mismatch. Losing won't effect Khan's reputation as he is EXPECTED to get washed.


..............and when the hell did James Toney say, "health comes first?"

[NapalmKnuckles]

This is my last reply to you spastic

Khan is stepping in the ring with a guy who will considerably outweigh him, a guy who is a heavy puncher, thus the danger increases 10-fold.

As your favorite boxer says health comes first

I think you're missing the point. Of course Khan faces risk of being seriously hurt, which pretty much all boxers face. But Khan does not face much risk career wise. Another loss on Khan's resume won't do much to Khan's stock, especially when its against a guy everyone expects you to lose to. If Khan loses he still walks away with an 8 figure pay day and still has his mandatory status for Garcia's title a long with a few other fights at 147. Compared to the negative effect that a Brook loss would have on Khan's stock. Canelo is far less riskier to Khan than Brook is career wise.

[bluebeam]

The same Devon who beat Maidana

How about the other slayer of Maidana i.e Kotelnik? another one Khan dominated

Diaz was good enough to draw with Porter, but Khan gets no credit for beating him? really

Porter needed two attempts to beat him, and Khan softened him up for Porter

You talk as if Khan is in the ring with Jo Jo Dans, Kevin Bumzier and Frankie Gavin level opponents

You are over here trying to discredit every one of Khans wins....yet Khan has a overall better resume than Thurman, Brook, Broner, Porter....

You can flip is anyway you want

Porter gets no credit for beating diaz. So why the hell would anybody credit khan for doing the same thing. And getting dripped in the process .

Diaz was a shot fighter, whether it was porter or Khan fighting him.

Alexander beat maidana in 2011.

Khan beat alexander in 2014 after alexander had just got his ass kicked by porter remember?

3 year difference in alexander. But keep acting like alexander was on fire when they fought.

Alexander had no momentum when they fought, khan ducked him when alexander had a title and a winning streak.

this isn't a thread about broner,thurman, or anybody else.

This is a khan thread. Don't try to deflect to broner and thurman.

this is about khan resume.

[FrankieBruno]

Porter gets no credit for beating diaz. So why the hell would anybody credit khan for doing the same thing. And getting dripped in the process .

Diaz was a shot fighter, whether it was porter or Khan fighting him.

Alexander beat maidana in 2011.

Khan beat alexander in 2014 after alexander had just got his ass kicked by porter remember?

3 year difference in alexander. But keep acting like alexander was on fire when they fought.

Alexander had no momentum when they fought, khan ducked him when alexander had a title and a winning streak.

this isn't a thread about broner,thurman, or anybody else.

This is a khan thread. Don't try to deflect to broner and thurman.

this is about khan resume.

So Diaz was a shot fighter who Porter struggled with

So why give Brook credit for beating Porter? i mean if Porter is drawing with shot fighters what does that say about Porter?

Why give credit to anyone for that matter? every boxer has some kind of ***** in their armor

You have some really ****** logic, we could use that same argument to destroy Floyds resume...

This guy was over the hill, this guy has a loss, this guy had diarrhea the night before..****in hell mate, give it a rest