Comments Thread For: Holyfield Tabs Klitschko: If Tactics Change, He'll Beat Tyson Fury

[kiDynamite92]

How DARE you insult Holyfield like that you little punk!

So let's get this straight.. When your old favourite fighters make claims that are OBVIOUSLY false, we are supposed to believe their words for gospel.

But when a fighter like Holyfield makes comments like Wladimir being able to beat Fury in a rematch and Pac really beating Floyd, which are actually backed up by substantial evidence, SUDDENLY he is a crack head?

Double standards..

And NUT BAGGERY!

Lol at this butthurt loser KT. You bumify every American there is to hype up your fraud brothers but when one says something good about them you hang on their nuts.

There was no substantial evidence for Pacquaio winning the fight, if there was the decision would have been over turned by the commmision or an investigation would have been launched into the fight atleast - neither happened. Fury dominated Klitschko, there was no point where he was in trouble or where the fight was in doubt. Fury is much better then Klitschko and would beat him down again with ease.

[kiDynamite92]

This kiDynamite92 is an obvious ButtHurtMikeTysonFreak , haha!

Holyfield never took any drugs like crack and stuff that your precious little Mike Tyson devoured, haha your such a typical loser. HOLYFIELD KICKED TYSONS AZZ ALL AROUND THE RING not Once but TWICE!!!
Sent him to the Mental Ward in that 2nd fight too!
Read Deal wit it you pathetic "Tython" loser... HaHaHa

Holyfields analysis on this, PAC vs May, and many other fights were spot on.

Lol at this loser p@ct@rd/klitard. Yeah Holyfield did beat Mike Tyson and im happy to admit he was the better man.

But only a deluded fool would be believe his claims as of recent.

[Elroy1]

'Pacquaio should have won' - Holyfield on Mayweather vs Pacquaio.



That's about as much credibility this crackhead has nowadays.

How DARE you insult Holyfield like that you little punk!

So let's get this straight.. When your old favourite fighters make claims that are OBVIOUSLY false, we are supposed to believe their words for gospel.

But when a fighter like Holyfield makes comments like Wladimir being able to beat Fury in a rematch and Pac really beating Floyd, which are actually backed up by substantial evidence, SUDDENLY he is a crack head?

Double standards..

And NUT BAGGERY!

[julianjaz]

kiDynamite92 is ButtHurtMikeTysonFreakHaHa

'Pacquaio should have won' - Holyfield on Mayweather vs Pacquaio.



That's about as much credibility this crackhead has nowadays.

This kiDynamite92 is an obvious ButtHurtMikeTysonFreak , haha!

Holyfield never took any drugs like crack and stuff that your precious little Mike Tyson devoured, haha your such a typical loser. HOLYFIELD KICKED TYSONS AZZ ALL AROUND THE RING not Once but TWICE!!!
Sent him to the Mental Ward in that 2nd fight too!
Read Deal wit it you pathetic "Tython" loser... HaHaHa

Holyfields analysis on this, PAC vs May, and many other fights were spot on.

[Evan Fields]

Klitschko is 39, he should rematch Fury as soon as possible. If he drags it out it could backfire on him.

Defintely could but Wlad's been fighting like a 45 year old for 10 years now. I think it's more about getting Fury to play into Wlads fight than to figure out how to beat Fury at his. We will see in May when Wlad comes down as injured

[Reverb]

It really wasn't close.

Actually i'm glad Fury beat him convincingly on points. Had he knocked him out we would have heard "it was a lucky shot" or people saying Klitschko has never had a good chin etc.. But there's no excuse now, Fury was just better in every department all night.

Anyway i just can't see what Wlad is going to do different at 40 years of age. He has fought the same way for 10 years, it's muscle memory now. He can go through camp with all the best intention of letting his hands go more and things like that and we'll here about how he's doing it in sparring but when the bell rings on fight night, he will revert to type. It's the only thing he knows. He's not going to be adding new strings to his bow at 40 year old, he's not going to get any better, just worse. He's only human.

Anyway he was a great champion but he's had his time and now it's a new era. He just ran into a young guy who is also bigger and a stylistic nightmare for him in terms of boxing skills. It happens to the best of 'em.

Whatever my post says, I completely agree with this. Seems a complete view of the situation.

[Reverb]

Klitschko developed his safe, smart style and utilised all of his advantages to the maximum, but when he's forced into it he does have a serious arsenal. The few shots he landed on Fury were the best quality of the fight; but between his age, the years he's settled into his style and his mentality of taking zero risks- he'd have to take that risk, stay in there and make it all or nothing in the rematch. If he does that, I'd give him a good chance of regaining his title, but I'm not convinced that is in his make up.
Unspectacular as it was I have to admit I found their first encounter quite absorbing. Not one to watch multiple times but intriguing at the time.

[deathofaclown]

I wouldn't rule Wladimir out. It was a close fight the first time

It really wasn't close.

Actually i'm glad Fury beat him convincingly on points. Had he knocked him out we would have heard "it was a lucky shot" or people saying Klitschko has never had a good chin etc.. But there's no excuse now, Fury was just better in every department all night.

Anyway i just can't see what Wlad is going to do different at 40 years of age. He has fought the same way for 10 years, it's muscle memory now. He can go through camp with all the best intention of letting his hands go more and things like that and we'll here about how he's doing it in sparring but when the bell rings on fight night, he will revert to type. It's the only thing he knows. He's not going to be adding new strings to his bow at 40 year old, he's not going to get any better, just worse. He's only human.

Anyway he was a great champion but he's had his time and now it's a new era. He just ran into a young guy who is also bigger and a stylistic nightmare for him in terms of boxing skills. It happens to the best of 'em.

[TAZ-G]

The real deal has spoken.

[Dr Rumack]

Not unreasonable to think that Wlad could take the rematch as Tyson had virtually no output as well. I'm not picking Wlad after his last two fights though as I thinkhe's mentally done with the game. If he comes in like he did with Pulev, he'll KO Fury. I just don't think his mind is in that place anymore.

If he comes out aggressive, it's certainly possible he stops Fury. Thing is, Fury will expect that and if Wlad doesn't get that early KO, he will be gassed by the 5th and might be stopped himself.

There are reasons why Wlad started fighting the way he does, and a big reason is he can't sustain an active pace. That's certainly not going to change at his age unless he juices hardcore.

Agree that Fury's output was next to nothing. How many times did he even put a fluid one-two together over the course of the fight? But the problem is even though it would have taken so little to win most of the first six rounds, Wlad's caution is so hard-wired that it's hard to see him actually doing it. He has spent so long smothering his opponent to avoid pocket exchanges that he can't press the action now that he needs to.

Fury is hittable, a little clumsy, and not all that sharp of a puncher. But his feet and sense of distance are good and he will force Wlad to reach and take risks to get to him. I just don't know if Wlad has it in him to do that.