Whats the worst...Mayweather/Berto or Pacquiao/Bradley

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Xi_
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Nov 2013
    • 3957
    • 194
    • 6
    • 13,179

    #11
    Originally posted by Doctor_Tenma
    Bradley actually has a very good chance of winning considering the circumstances, Berto never stood a chance. Big difference if you ask me.
    the only way he wins is if he robs pacquiao again......bradley isn't smart enough to beat pacquiao.

    Comment

    • ThatDude44
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Mar 2013
      • 3484
      • 175
      • 180
      • 28,546

      #12
      Is Pac-Bradley official?

      Comment

      • HanzGruber
        STRAPMEUP
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Dec 2011
        • 29824
        • 1,069
        • 238
        • 81,632

        #13
        Obviously Tim is better than berto. But *** this is the most fabricated rubber match I've ever seen. Only person who thinks Tim won the first time is mathed and Monica bradley

        Comment

        • megas30
          Greatness!!
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Nov 2009
          • 7135
          • 962
          • 368
          • 78,442

          #14
          Mayweather vs Berto, though not highly interesting, brought something new. However, Manny vs Bradley we have seen twice already and neither times was interesting, so Manny vs Bradley has to worse.

          Comment

          • Damn Wicked
            Sexy Mutha Fvkka
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Oct 2015
            • 7079
            • 1,218
            • 7,818
            • 46,960

            #15
            Mayweather - Berto was a shot fighter against the top fighter at welterweight. Bradley is a top fighter at welterweight. Berto has lost most of his recent fights and most people found him a suspect champion in his prime.

            Bradley is far above and beyond Berto. It's not even close. No fighter has ever had an easy time with Bradly and that includes Pac.

            Comment

            • DLT
              DMV
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Nov 2004
              • 17087
              • 737
              • 35
              • 24,277

              #16
              Pac-Bradley is much worse. Floyd-Berto was disappointing but it was clear that Floyd was just cashing out after the Pac fight. The thing is that Floyd beat Pac. If he had loss then he would've been shredded for fighting Berto. Pac-Bradley is a much better fight but no one wants to see it a 3rd time especially after the Floyd loss. He should fight Crawford. It's a win win situation.

              If he loses, it doesn't hurt his legacy and he can ride off into the sunset. If he wins then he greatly enhances his legacy and will be the most talked about fighter in the sport again. I'm just a firm believer in you have to do more to come back from a loss or else that is the last thing we will still remember

              Comment

              • FrankieClutch
                OTSC
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • May 2009
                • 6084
                • 177
                • 396
                • 26,671

                #17
                Both are ehhhh. Floyd-Berto is the lesser of the two fights though.

                Comment

                • Damn Wicked
                  Sexy Mutha Fvkka
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Oct 2015
                  • 7079
                  • 1,218
                  • 7,818
                  • 46,960

                  #18
                  Originally posted by megas30
                  Mayweather vs Berto, though not highly interesting, brought something new. However, Manny vs Bradley we have seen twice already and neither times was interesting, so Manny vs Bradley has to worse.
                  So you'd rather see a shot fighter against the top guy rather than a very good fighter as his opponent? In that case Mayweather could have chosen Rob Salka as an opponent because we haven't seen him verses Mayweather before?
                  Is that better than a rubber match with a proven, top fighter? Ridiculous.
                  Your hate is blinding you.
                  Last edited by Damn Wicked; 12-09-2015, 12:18 PM.

                  Comment

                  • boliodogs
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • May 2008
                    • 33358
                    • 824
                    • 1,782
                    • 309,589

                    #19
                    I don't want to see Pacquiao fight Bradley again. He has already clearly beat him twice by maybe 9 rounds to 3 rounds with correct scoring. Still Bradley is a highly regarded champion while Berto was ranked way down at 20th. Mayweather is guilty of a real cherry pick and it was the worst fight of the two. Let's hope Crawford gets the fight and Pacquiao gets a chance to win a title at 140 which is a very good weight for him now.

                    Comment

                    • Champ4Life
                      Contender
                      • May 2012
                      • 250
                      • 4
                      • 0
                      • 9,706

                      #20
                      Mayweather/Berto was the worst. Berto had no chance of winning. Bradley actually has a shot at winning even though nobody wants to see a 3rd fight with them.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP