Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Klitschko Unfazed By Pound-For-Pound Discussion

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Comments Thread For: Klitschko Unfazed By Pound-For-Pound Discussion

    The 49th win in Floyd Mayweather’s career—a 12-round decision over Andre Berto on Sept. 13th in Las Vegas—was followed up by his pre-fight promise that it would be the last-ever time he laces ‘em up.

    Assuming (pretending?) his retirement sticks, the undefeated boxer goes out as World welterweight champ, as well as the best fighter in the world in a pound-for-pound sense.
    [Click Here To Read More]

  • #2
    wlad is a class act!

    will clinch his way to a win. i hope we see a knockout.

    Comment


    • #3
      I'm not a Klitschko fan at all but I think he should have been the new #1 guy on the list. Ida if he's boring, Floyd was boring too.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Bigg Rigg View Post
        I'm not a Klitschko fan at all but I think he should have been the new #1 guy on the list. Ida if he's boring, Floyd was boring too.
        It's not because he is boring, it's because Wlad beats lesser opponents than everyone else and does so in less impressive fashion. Golovkin fights the same level of competition and obliterates them much more impressively, but no one has him at #1. Kovalev does, too. Pacquiao didn't need to hold 200 times to beat a lesser opponent and knock him down 5 times. Gonzalez beats better competition and looks better.

        So what case is there for Wlad? He has a worse resume and worse performances than the other fighters who could be p4p #1.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by angad10 View Post
          wlad is a class act!

          will clinch his way to a win. i hope we see a knockout.

          He stops Fury

          Comment


          • #6
            Was never a huge Klitschko fan but he has dominated the div for more than a decade and has fought all his mandatories and the top dogs of the div.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by bojangles1987 View Post
              It's not because he is boring, it's because Wlad beats lesser opponents than everyone else and does so in less impressive fashion. Golovkin fights the same level of competition and obliterates them much more impressively, but no one has him at #1. Kovalev does, too. Pacquiao didn't need to hold 200 times to beat a lesser opponent and knock him down 5 times. Gonzalez beats better competition and looks better.

              So what case is there for Wlad? He has a worse resume and worse performances than the other fighters who could be p4p #1.
              They are good opponents, paluv is a great opp and he destroyed him.

              U just hate wlad, it's apparent in ur posts.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by bojangles1987 View Post
                It's not because he is boring, it's because Wlad beats lesser opponents than everyone else and does so in less impressive fashion. Golovkin fights the same level of competition and obliterates them much more impressively, but no one has him at #1. Kovalev does, too. Pacquiao didn't need to hold 200 times to beat a lesser opponent and knock him down 5 times. Gonzalez beats better competition and looks better.

                So what case is there for Wlad? He has a worse resume and worse performances than the other fighters who could be p4p #1.
                He is the best fighter in his division, been taking away some 0's recently and he hasn't lost in over 10yrs. I've had Wlad in the top 3 for a while. With Floyd gone, he's #1 imo. You can say he holds 200x a fight but in some fights he gets knockouts. Floyd holds, rinds and doesn't knock out anyone. They're both boring.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by bojangles1987 View Post
                  It's not because he is boring, it's because Wlad beats lesser opponents than everyone else and does so in less impressive fashion. Golovkin fights the same level of competition and obliterates them much more impressively, but no one has him at #1. Kovalev does, too. Pacquiao didn't need to hold 200 times to beat a lesser opponent and knock him down 5 times. Gonzalez beats better competition and looks better.

                  So what case is there for Wlad? He has a worse resume and worse performances than the other fighters who could be p4p #1.
                  It's not his fault the div is not that strong, he fights all his mandatories and beats all the number 1's in the div convincingly. There is no current heavyweight that can cause any problems. Wilder and his chicken legs will soon be knocked out; fought two mandatories to avoid Povetkin. Everybody was saying Povetkin, Pulev, Haye were going to be difficult. He thrashed Povetkin and had Pulev seeing stars.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Bigg Rigg View Post
                    He is the best fighter in his division, been taking away some 0's recently and he hasn't lost in over 10yrs. I've had Wlad in the top 3 for a while. With Floyd gone, he's #1 imo. You can say he holds 200x a fight but in some fights he gets knockouts. Floyd holds, rinds and doesn't knock out anyone. They're both boring.
                    Again, it has nothing to do with being boring. He doesn't fight the best competition, and he doesn't beat them as impressively as other fighters beat similar or better competition. So no, Wlad is not p4p #1.

                    And Floyd didn't hold anything close to what Wlad does. That is such bull****. I don't know where this narrative came from but it's completely false. He beat better fighters than Wlad or anyone else and did so more impressively.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP