Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Mancini: If Mayweather Beats GGG, Top 10 of All-Time

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    yea go beat a guy with a resume full of trash and bums and then.. only then you can be top 10.. n*gga please

    floyd already cemented his legacy on may 2.

    so many clown on berto but bertos resume is just as good as triple bum. lol

    if triple bum does drop to 154 and loses, tards will just say he was drained.
    why not pick somebody from his own division, why must he face a middleweight.

    Comment


    • #42
      Top 10 all time for beating a guy who's beaten........?????? Who?

      Comment


      • #43
        the same thing was said about pacquiao.. lol .. now triple bum is the new boogeyman... but one question his groupies fail to answer is.. who the **** has triple bum faced? name one elite opponent on his resume..just one please.. since you cant .. then how does beating him puts floyd higher on an all time great list? triple bum is nothing but the new jeff lacy.

        the guy is 33 years old and his resume is utter and complete trash.

        Comment


        • #44
          If someone doesn't believe Mayweather is top 10, beating GGG shouldn't put him there. Either he's already there or he's not.

          Beating GGG will do nothing more than what Mayweather's win over Alvarez did. A young buck that had to "cut" weight. The excuses will come and people will then claim he's ducking (insert random name from random weight class).

          No point. Finish the career fighting a guy like Berto who fights at 147 and is legit for anyone in that division. it's cool with me as long as its free. Brook would be my selection if I got to choose.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by Jcsuper View Post
            lol at Floyd getting credit. First off if he doesnt fight GGG at 160 without a rehydration clause he will get no credit. Second if he fights defensively he will get no credit and haters will say he ran.

            Only way he gets credit is to fight at 160lbs against a 172-178lbs GGG on fight night, fight offensively and stops him, anybody who thinks it is physically possible is a fool.

            After that fight people will say Floyd needs to fight Ward to crack the top 25 atg.

            Look at my sig, haters like Hugh Grant were saying a few years ago that floyd had to fight Cotto DLH Mosley Hatton to be with the legends, now these same haters are still hating, even if he has beaten all these guys + Pacquiao, Alvarez, Marquez and others
            Are "rehydration clauses" an acceptable thing now? Yeah that would be pathetic.

            Coincidentally Mancini is part of the reason same day weigh-ins are banned and "rehydration clauses" are just a way to bypass that rule.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by elishua F View Post
              the same thing was said about pacquiao.. lol .. now triple bum is the new boogeyman... but one question his groupies fail to answer is.. who the **** has triple bum faced? name one elite opponent on his resume..just one please.. since you cant .. then how does beating him puts floyd higher on an all time great list? triple bum is nothing but the new jeff lacy.

              the guy is 33 years old and his resume is utter and complete trash.
              The same thing was said about Pacquaio 5 years ago. That fight was dismal and most acknowledged it was meaningless by the time it was signed.

              Except all the dumb actors and rappers who bought $10,000 tickets then acted all surprised that Pacquaio looked shot.

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by WESS View Post
                If someone doesn't believe Mayweather is top 10, beating GGG shouldn't put him there. Either he's already there or he's not.

                Beating GGG will do nothing more than what Mayweather's win over Alvarez did. A young buck that had to "cut" weight. The excuses will come and people will then claim he's ducking (insert random name from random weight class).

                No point. Finish the career fighting a guy like Berto who fights at 147 and is legit for anyone in that division. it's cool with me as long as its free. Brook would be my selection if I got to choose.
                Then lets just agree he's not top 10 all time, because he's never fighting Golovkin at the full 154 limit and as you concede, most of his big wins like Canelo, Pacquaio, Mosely, etc have major asterisks next to them.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by Cruisin' View Post
                  Then lets just agree he's not top 10 all time, because he's never fighting Golovkin at the full 154 limit and as you concede, most of his big wins like Canelo, Pacquaio, Mosely, etc have major asterisks next to them.
                  I won't agree and I never said anything about the 154 limit.

                  No matter how you slice it, GGG doesn't fight at 154 which is why he would have to "cut" weight. Just as Alvarez had to "cut" weight.

                  Your entire post is just trash.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by WESS View Post
                    I won't agree and I never said anything about the 154 limit.

                    No matter how you slice it, GGG doesn't fight at 154 which is why he would have to "cut" weight. Just as Alvarez had to "cut" weight.

                    Your entire post is just trash.
                    Oh then I took a dump on your faulty logic. Oops. Here's some toilet paper.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by Jcsuper View Post
                      lol at Floyd getting credit. First off if he doesnt fight GGG at 160 without a rehydration clause he will get no credit. Second if he fights defensively he will get no credit and haters will say he ran.

                      Only way he gets credit is to fight at 160lbs against a 172-178lbs GGG on fight night, fight offensively and stops him, anybody who thinks it is physically possible is a fool.

                      After that fight people will say Floyd needs to fight Ward to crack the top 25 atg.

                      Look at my sig, haters like Hugh Grant were saying a few years ago that floyd had to fight Cotto DLH Mosley Hatton to be with the legends, now these same haters are still hating, even if he has beaten all these guys + Pacquiao, Alvarez, Marquez and others
                      Floyd is going to get a lot of credit after he retires. I think as more time goes on, the more people will say how great he was. The truth is people don't like him because to many people he comes off as a very unlikable character and it's difficult for people to give high praise to those they dislike. As time passes, those feelings will too and people will be able to recognize his ring accomplishments and fighting skills for what they truly are. Something about aging that allows people to forgive and forget, look at Tyson he was one of the most hated athletes in the world for a time and now he's everyone's favorite retired boxer. Even Ali was hated by millions of people during the height of his career.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP