Originally posted by Craveman
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Mancini: If Mayweather Beats GGG, Top 10 of All-Time
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Jcsuper View PostI've sent you flowers you should get them soon. Can send you a teddy bear too.
Btw you would be the first fool to say Pac is top 10 if he was to fight and beat Alvarez and GGG.
Second off, I made a thread with a poll about Floyd's ATG ranking and I personally voted him in the top 20. That's not a place I'd put Pac.
Third off, the general consensus in the aforementioned thread, which includes many but not all participating Pac fans, placed Floyd in the range of 15-35. Stop acting like everbody is not giving Floyd any credit for beating Pac, or that everyone is acting like Floyd is a bum.Last edited by BrometheusBob.; 07-22-2015, 09:45 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hugh grant View PostIf Floyd can beat GGG at 160, he would be the best of this era. Right now he is one of the best of this era, arguably the best of this era.
It woud be equivalent to SRLs win over Hagler. Apart from GGG is not quite as good as Hagler yet, but I take into consideration Floyd is a lil smaller than SRL.
Comment
-
I think it's a ****** comment for two reasons. First that fight has no chance of ever happening. Team Mayweather wants GGG to fight him at 147 and GGG won't do that. Secondly Mayweather has been fighting pro for about 18 years and been in well over twenty world title fights and he is past his prime. He is either one of the 10 best fighters of all time by now or he isn't. His rating in history should already be established by his 48 fight body of work. Where he rates among the all time greats should not depend on the outcome of one single fight with GGG when he is 38 years old and past his prime.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MC Hammer View PostA little? WW is Floyd's 4th weightclass as compared to SRL's first. And he's 38 friggin years old. You guys will never accept anything as being good enough so why should he even bother. Hell to say he MIGHT be the best of this era is an insult, because anyone who actually watches the sport knows hands down he is.
No, he shouldn't.
Comment
-
Originally posted by el*** View Postlol, first its floyd isnt top 10 unless he beats pac. beats pac 10-2 in first gear, now its floyd isnt top 10 unless he beats GGG at 38 years old
Remind me again what Ali, SRL, SRR all looked like at 38 years old?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bronx2245 View PostAli was getting his ass-whooped by Larry Holmes, while he already had signs of Parkinson's. Leonard had 40 fights (36 wins), he lost to Terry Norris at 35, and then Camacho at 41. Sugar Ray Robinson had 200 BOUTS! He won his rematch with Basilio at age 37. His last win was a KO victory at age 44. That's bananas! Sugar Ray Robinson will always be ahead of Floyd. Sugar Ray Robinson beat a man on 02/14/1945, then beat Jake La Motta on 02/23/1945. He then beat another man on 09/18/1945, and then beat Jake LaMotta again on 09/26/1945! WTF???
Sugar Ray Robinson started off as a lightweight, where he won against the current World lightweight belt holder (Sammy Angott) in a non-title bout.
Then he moved onwards and won the world title @ Welterweight, middleweight, and failed at light heavyweight due to passing out from extreme heat in the 14th round (...and he was ahead on the scorecards that fight).
Sugar Ray Robinson was 143-9-3 at the age of 40. He continued to box until he retired at the age of 44, with a record of 173-19-6 (108 KOs).Last edited by UNBIASED BOXING; 07-22-2015, 10:09 PM.
Comment
-
Ggg hasnt even proven anything. Floyd dont even get credit for guys who have much better resumes
Comment
Comment