Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Miguel Cotto Crushes Daniel Geale in Four, Canelo Next?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Someone88
    replied
    Very good win for Cotto!

    Leave a comment:


  • PeasantCrusha
    replied
    The best part of a Cotto or Danny win, is the quality of hate-posts that seem to go on for weeks.

    Nothing like watching them spin a Cotto win into a loss. It's entertaining as hell...


    "But, Geale was winning until he was losing doe..."

    "But, Geale would have won if he did not get outboxed all night"

    "Cotto cheated by punching real hard doe....Not cool"

    Leave a comment:


  • Don Pichardo
    replied
    Originally posted by Brickyardigan View Post
    What if Floyd fights GGG after beating Cotto for the middleweight title?
    He would be born again hard.

    Leave a comment:


  • Don Pichardo
    replied
    Originally posted by bambam182 View Post
    funny how HBO didnt even comment on cottos head hitting geale in the jaw before knocking him down lol, anyone else notice that?
    They also didn't comment on cotto droppng geale in round 2 it was ruled a slip but it was clear that it was a delayed reaction.

    Leave a comment:


  • ricodonjefe
    replied
    Lmao at the Trolls!!!! Warrr Cotto earns a decision in tuff fight with canelo .....can't wait to see this fight now this will be money well spend on ordering. ...Cotto name has been established in boxing and no I'm not on the nuts canelo and ggg need cotto,cotto don't need them....

    Leave a comment:


  • SonofZorro
    replied
    Canelo does not want a Cotto loss at this time?

    Bearcat thinks Canelo should pursue Andrade or Bundrage's 154lb belts first before taking a Cotto whipping. Why take a beating from Cotto when Canelo has a terrible inept lazy trainer and Cotto is very dangerous now under Freddy tutelage and guidance? Go get a 154lb belt from the easy other two 154lb champs just not Floyd?? Canelo does not want a Cotto fight now anyway as it would be a terrible career stopping loss? Bearcat knows this-Listen?

    Leave a comment:


  • SonofZorro
    replied
    Geale is weak and a quitter with no Balls.

    Cotto beat up Geale who is a quitter and terrible. Aussies are known for being a weak bunch anyway. Cotto looked great against a Ball less wimp in Geale.

    Leave a comment:


  • aboutfkntime
    replied
    Originally posted by P4PB3st View Post
    I am a Cotto fan but without the catch weight his win would look better. But do not forget Pacquiao used this and Mayweather used the catch weight against Canelo. This does not mean that now Cotto should use this, I just want to mention other fighters used catch weights, even Andre Ward against Chad Dawson. Still it was a good win for Cotto against a former two time Champ, who beat Sturm etc.
    No, Dawson requested 168, so that he could become a multi-division champion.

    But yea, I agree with you in principle.

    What Pacquiao did, was prove that blatant weight manipulation would be accepted (overlooked) by the majority of fans.

    Well, you " fans " who accepted Manny-weight, can now accept Cotto-weight.

    Leave a comment:


  • aboutfkntime
    replied
    Originally posted by PRPOWERPUNCHES View Post
    WTF are you talking about? Cotto didn't discover or invent the catch weight and it was here before Cotto and will be here after him. Stop taking credit away from yet another great performance from Cotto pato sucio.

    PRPP
    Catchweights have been around a long time, but they were used in exception, and were not a part of most standard fight negotiations.

    We all know who made the weight an aspect that had to be discussed during a fight negotiation...... boxing used to have divisions.

    Leave a comment:


  • R_Walken
    replied
    People please stop with the draining excuse

    Cotto beats Geale 157 , 160 or what ever weight Geale would want

    Cotto is levels above Geale as far as talent

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X
TOP