Did Cotto lose to Pacquaio because of the catchweight

[Queen_Leia]

I watched that fight and Cotto looked dead in the ring to the point where you can roll him under the ropes.

Do you think Manny beat Cotto because of the catchweight?

[The Problem Child]

He lost to Pacquiao purely because of style. Volume punchers who can move in angles will always pose a problem to Cotto who takes his time changing stances.

[Bushidō]

No he would have have lost even without the catchweight. He would have did better but I think he still would have lost.

[Larry the boss]

Your gay avi's along with the way you try to reverse threads that was already a **** thread makes me wanna do this

[Cuban Linx]

No. The catchweight didn't help him, but that's not the only reason he lost. Honestly no matter what version Cotto fought at he would have lost to Pacquiao maybe not as brutally, but he would have lost. The hand speed, the move speed was too much for him.

[UTEP]

I watched that fight and Cotto looked dead in the ring to the point where you can roll him under the ropes.

Do you think Manny beat Cotto because of the catchweight?

AYO! What the *** is up with your avi dog?

[sugarsmosley]

Your gay avi's along with the way you try to reverse threads that was already a **** thread makes me wanna do this

hahahaha im with larry on this one. enough crap threads.

[YouHateRicans!]

Cotto lost because at that time, Pac was using that juice.

[noStylez]

Cotto lost because at that time, Pac was using that juice.

No he would have lost either way but I put blame on his corner as well. They were horrible, but stylistically it's a bad matchup.

[hectari]

Another duplicate thread because you are mad your king you worship is being questioned, why are you still allowed to post on here? your threads are not even unique, just duplicates switched with using Pacquiaos name in place of Floyds

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=630026