Bradley was three years after JMM. I can't even believe you're arguing that because Mosley can stand around a take a beating better as a shot fighter that it says anything about the JMM-Casa fight. All you have to do is watch JMM-Casa. It's a really good fight. That performance, on the heels of Katsidis, speaks to Casa still being a very tough out at that time. It's a better win than Pac-Mosley. Period.
Marquez knocked out Pacquiao. Is he greater than Pacquiao?
Collapse
-
Mosley may still be able to beat Katsidis types without getting knocked out of the ring, and it's many years later. On the Cano showing, he beats or even money with several top tenners still.Bradley was three years after JMM. I can't even believe you're arguing that because Mosley can stand around a take a beating better as a shot fighter that it says anything about the JMM-Casa fight. All you have to do is watch JMM-Casa. It's a really good fight. That performance, on the heels of Katsidis, speaks to Casa still being a very tough out at that time. It's a better win than Pac-Mosley. Period.
I agree Casa looked good vs JMM, like I said, JMM makes many of his opponents look good. You could see his legs were shot though. Casa never won a decent fight again, or came close.Comment
-
oh this is just crap... some ppl are quick to label MAB as past prime even in his first outing w/ pac, as he had wars with morales, but 4yrs later he's an atg win for jmm and not for pac-mab2? hatton may not be a more prolific boxer than mab, but he was the champ at 140 then and just tko'd malignaggi.Comment
-
Exactly, the logic that JMM knocked Pac out is as sound as saying Buster Douglas is better than Tyson for the same reason.Comment
-
Who said that? MAB at the time was everyone's number one at 130, if not lineal like Hatton at 40. I didn't say MAB II wasn't a good win for Pac either. the point was is MAB for JMM on par with any of Manny's top ten wins. Of course it is.oh this is just crap... some ppl are quick to label MAB as past prime even in his first outing w/ pac, as he had wars with morales, but 4yrs later he's an atg win for jmm and not for pac-mab2? hatton may not be a more prolific boxer than mab, but he was the champ at 140 then and just tko'd malignaggi.Comment
-
you words were jmm-mab was better than hatton or sasakul, not on par. hatton and sasakul were lineal championships for pac.Comment
-
Well, if you look at their careers I gie a sligh edge to Pacquio, but head to head I actually have Marquez at 4-0 vs Pacuaio, though he got robbed 3 times.
I'd say Marquez.Comment
-
-
Comment
Comment