Would Robert Guerrero be a tougher fight for Pacquiao than Rios?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jack Napier
    Whores on Our Cul de Sac
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2010
    • 8668
    • 812
    • 424
    • 16,030

    #31
    Pac's shot, he's in deep against either of these guys for that reason
    Rios is physically a better fit at WW than Guerrero is
    he coulda been fighting above LW a long time ago
    the fact that he's moving up is overplayed, Pac's just a JWW himself
    he's more relentless than Guerrero too, he's the tougher foe
    not like Guerrero couldn't beat the current version of Pac though
    a few yrs ago either of these fights would be a joke
    now? Pac's hardly a shoe in to beat anybody decent, he's shot

    Comment

    • Jc8804
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Mar 2013
      • 6231
      • 394
      • 143
      • 30,652

      #32
      2 south paws. Interesting fight

      Comment

      • GoldenGloveLove
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jul 2013
        • 2105
        • 98
        • 69
        • 10,496

        #33
        If Pac's chin is ruined, Rios. If not, it would normally be Guerrero. Rios is built for Pac to destroy even though he's a good fighter himself. Guerrero is much smarter than Rios, much more defensively skilled and he takes Pac's southpaw mojo away from him.

        Comment

        • BigAlexSand
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Apr 2012
          • 2325
          • 61
          • 68
          • 8,910

          #34
          I would say guerrero has possibly one of the ugliest styles, next to K9. Saying that he could cause problems but Rios has hands and that is the biggest concern for Pacquiao.

          So in my view Rios is a more dangerous fight, while guerrero would have been just difficult to ajist to but I'm sure Pacquiao would break him.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP